Intel HD Graphics 3000 vs Intel GMA X4500

Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 3000 and Intel GMA X4500 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 3000

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 5 month(s) later
  • Around 59% higher core clock speed: 850 MHz vs 533 MHz
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 32 nm vs 65 nm
Launch date 1 February 2011 vs 1 September 2008
Core clock speed 850 MHz vs 533 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 32 nm vs 65 nm

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 3000
GPU 2: Intel GMA X4500

Name Intel HD Graphics 3000 Intel GMA X4500
PassMark - G3D Mark 261
PassMark - G2D Mark 35
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1137
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1137
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 101
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 101

Compare specifications (specs)

Intel HD Graphics 3000 Intel GMA X4500

Essentials

Architecture Generation 6.0 Generation 5.0
Code name Sandy Bridge GT2 Eaglelake
Launch date 1 February 2011 1 September 2008
Place in performance rating 1604 not rated
Type Laptop Desktop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1100 MHz
Core clock speed 850 MHz 533 MHz
Floating-point performance 20.4 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 32 nm 65 nm
Pipelines 12
Texture fill rate 1.7 GTexel / s
Transistor count 995 million
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 13 Watt

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 1.0 x16 PCIe 1.0 x16

API support

DirectX 10.1 10.0
OpenGL 3.1 2.0

Memory

Memory bus width 64 / 128 Bit
Shared memory 1