Intel HD Graphics 3000 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 LP
Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 3000 and NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 LP videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 3000
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 55% higher core clock speed: 850 MHz vs 550 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 32 nm vs 40 nm
- 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 258 vs 123
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 1 February 2011 vs 1 December 2009 |
| Core clock speed | 850 MHz vs 550 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm vs 40 nm |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 258 vs 123 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 LP
- 2.6x more texture fill rate: 4.4 GTexel / s vs 1.7 GTexel / s
- Around 33% higher pipelines: 16 vs 12
- 2.2x better floating-point performance: 44 gflops vs 20.4 gflops
- 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 75 vs 35
- 10.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1023 vs 101
- 10.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1023 vs 101
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Texture fill rate | 4.4 GTexel / s vs 1.7 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 16 vs 12 |
| Floating-point performance | 44 gflops vs 20.4 gflops |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 75 vs 35 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1023 vs 101 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1023 vs 101 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 3000
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 LP
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel HD Graphics 3000 | NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 LP |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 258 | 123 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 35 | 75 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1137 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1137 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 101 | 1023 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 101 | 1023 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 2855 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel HD Graphics 3000 | NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 LP | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Generation 6.0 | Tesla 2.0 |
| Code name | Sandy Bridge GT2 | GT218 |
| Launch date | 1 February 2011 | 1 December 2009 |
| Place in performance rating | 1598 | 1599 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $169 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 850 MHz | 550 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 20.4 gflops | 44 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 12 | 16 |
| Texture fill rate | 1.7 GTexel / s | 4.4 GTexel / s |
| Transistor count | 995 million | 260 million |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 28 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 168 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 10.1 | 10.1 |
| OpenGL | 3.1 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
| Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Shared memory | 1 | |
| Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 12.8 GB / s | |
| Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare Intel HD Graphics 3000 with others
IntelHD Graphics 3000 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 9400M G
IntelHD Graphics 3000 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 230M
IntelHD Graphics 3000 vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 380 LP
IntelHD Graphics 3000 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 520
IntelHD Graphics 3000 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 620 OEM
IntelHD Graphics 3000 vs
AMDRadeon HD 8180
