Intel HD Graphics 405 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8400M GS
Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 405 and NVIDIA GeForce 8400M GS videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 405
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- 4.2x more texture fill rate: 13.32 GTexel / s vs 3.2 GTexel / s
- 8.3x better floating-point performance: 213.1 gflops vs 25.6 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 80 nm
- Around 83% lower typical power consumption: 6 Watt vs 11 Watt
| Launch date | 1 April 2015 vs 9 May 2007 |
| Texture fill rate | 13.32 GTexel / s vs 3.2 GTexel / s |
| Floating-point performance | 213.1 gflops vs 25.6 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 80 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 6 Watt vs 11 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 405
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 8400M GS
| Name | Intel HD Graphics 405 | NVIDIA GeForce 8400M GS |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 1604 | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 101 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 34 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 40 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 40 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel HD Graphics 405 | NVIDIA GeForce 8400M GS | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Generation 8.0 | Tesla |
| Code name | Braswell GT1 | G86 |
| Launch date | 1 April 2015 | 9 May 2007 |
| Place in performance rating | 1703 | 1700 |
| Type | Laptop | Laptop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $14.99 | |
| Price now | $14.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 7.22 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 700 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 400 MHz | 400 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 213.1 gflops | 25.6 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 80 nm |
| Pipelines | 16 | 16 |
| Texture fill rate | 13.32 GTexel / s | 3.2 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 6 Watt | 11 Watt |
| Transistor count | 189 million | 210 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | MXM-I |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 10.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
| Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Maximum RAM amount | 256 MB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 6.4 GB / s | |
| Memory clock speed | 800 MHz | |
| Memory type | GDDR2 / GDDR3 | |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| HDR (High Dynamic-Range Lighting) | ||
| PCI-E 16x | ||
| PowerMizer 7.0 | ||