Intel HD Graphics 4600 vs AMD Radeon HD 8350 OEM

Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 4600 and AMD Radeon HD 8350 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

Intel HD Graphics 4600

AMD Radeon HD 8350 OEM

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 4600

Videocard is newer: launch date 4 month(s) later
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 22 nm vs 40 nm
3.9x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 630 vs 163
Around 41% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 314 vs 222
Around 11% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 3210 vs 2883

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	3 June 2013 vs 8 January 2013
Manufacturing process technology	22 nm vs 40 nm
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	630 vs 163
PassMark - G2D Mark	314 vs 222
Geekbench - OpenCL	3210 vs 2883

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8350 OEM

Around 63% higher core clock speed: 650 MHz vs 400 MHz
Around 4% higher texture fill rate: 5.2 GTexel / s vs 5 GTexel / s
4x more pipelines: 80 vs 20
2.1x better floating-point performance: 104.0 gflops vs 50 gflops
2.4x lower typical power consumption: 19 Watt vs 45 Watt

Core clock speed	650 MHz vs 400 MHz
Texture fill rate	5.2 GTexel / s vs 5 GTexel / s
Pipelines	80 vs 20
Floating-point performance	104.0 gflops vs 50 gflops
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	19 Watt vs 45 Watt

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 4600
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 8350 OEM

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

630

163

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

314

222

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

3210

2883

Name	Intel HD Graphics 4600	AMD Radeon HD 8350 OEM
PassMark - G3D Mark	630	163
PassMark - G2D Mark	314	222
Geekbench - OpenCL	3210	2883
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	8.844
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	171.17
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	1.115
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	10.385
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	12.361
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	988
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1702
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	2808
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	988
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1702
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	2808
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	194

Compare specifications (specs)

	Intel HD Graphics 4600	AMD Radeon HD 8350 OEM
Essentials
Architecture	Generation 7.5	TeraScale 2
Code name	Haswell GT2	Cedar
Launch date	3 June 2013	8 January 2013
Place in performance rating	1359	1088
Type	Laptop	Desktop
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1250 MHz
Core clock speed	400 MHz	650 MHz
Floating-point performance	50 gflops	104.0 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	22 nm	40 nm
Pipelines	20	80
Texture fill rate	5 GTexel / s	5.2 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	45 Watt	19 Watt
Transistor count	392 million	292 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	1x DVI, 1x HDMI
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 1.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Length		168 mm
Supplementary power connectors		None
API support
DirectX	12.0 (11_1)	11.2
OpenGL	4.3	4.4
Memory
Memory bus width	64 / 128 Bit	64 Bit
Shared memory	1
Maximum RAM amount		1 GB
Memory bandwidth		10.67 GB / s
Memory clock speed		1334 MHz
Memory type		DDR3
Technologies
Quick Sync