Intel HD Graphics 4600 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 530 OEM

Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 4600 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 530 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 4600

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 0 month(s) later
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 22 nm vs 40 nm
• Around 11% lower typical power consumption: 45 Watt vs 50 Watt
• Around 33% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 315 vs 236
• Around 39% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 3212 vs 2304
• Around 55% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 8.844 vs 5.698
• 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.115 vs 0.497
• Around 12% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 10.385 vs 9.27
• Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1702 vs 1589
• Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2808 vs 2716
• Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1702 vs 1589
• Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2808 vs 2716

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 530 OEM

• Around 75% higher core clock speed: 700 MHz vs 400 MHz
• 2.2x more texture fill rate: 11.2 GTexel / s vs 5 GTexel / s
• 4.8x more pipelines: 96 vs 20
• 5.4x better floating-point performance: 268.8 gflops vs 50 gflops
• Around 7% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 671 vs 628
• Around 2% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 175.385 vs 171.17
• Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1064 vs 988
• Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1064 vs 988

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 4600
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 530 OEM

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	628 671
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	315 236
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	3212 2304
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8.844 5.698
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	171.17 175.385
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.115 0.497
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	10.385 9.27
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	988 1064
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1702 1589
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2808 2716
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	988 1064
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1702 1589
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2808 2716

Compare specifications (specs)