Intel HD Graphics 4600 vs NVIDIA GeForce 510 OEM
Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 4600 and NVIDIA GeForce 510 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 4600
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- Around 20% higher texture fill rate: 5 GTexel / s vs 4.18 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 22 nm vs 40 nm
- 2.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 630 vs 290
- Around 93% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 314 vs 163
- 4.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 3210 vs 758
- Around 36% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1702 vs 1254
- Around 63% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2808 vs 1723
- Around 36% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1702 vs 1254
- Around 63% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2808 vs 1723
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 3 June 2013 vs 29 September 2011 |
| Texture fill rate | 5 GTexel / s vs 4.18 GTexel / s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm vs 40 nm |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 630 vs 290 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 314 vs 163 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 3210 vs 758 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1702 vs 1254 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2808 vs 1723 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1702 vs 1254 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2808 vs 1723 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 510 OEM
- Around 31% higher core clock speed: 523 MHz vs 400 MHz
- 2.4x more pipelines: 48 vs 20
- 2x better floating-point performance: 100.42 gflops vs 50 gflops
- Around 80% lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 45 Watt
| Core clock speed | 523 MHz vs 400 MHz |
| Pipelines | 48 vs 20 |
| Floating-point performance | 100.42 gflops vs 50 gflops |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt vs 45 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 4600
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 510 OEM
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel HD Graphics 4600 | NVIDIA GeForce 510 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 630 | 290 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 314 | 163 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 3210 | 758 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 8.844 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 171.17 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.115 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 10.385 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 12.361 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 988 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1702 | 1254 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2808 | 1723 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 988 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1702 | 1254 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2808 | 1723 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 194 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel HD Graphics 4600 | NVIDIA GeForce 510 OEM | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Generation 7.5 | Fermi 2.0 |
| Code name | Haswell GT2 | GF119 |
| Launch date | 3 June 2013 | 29 September 2011 |
| Place in performance rating | 1359 | 1360 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1250 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 400 MHz | 523 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 50 gflops | 100.42 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 20 | 48 |
| Texture fill rate | 5 GTexel / s | 4.18 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt | 25 Watt |
| Transistor count | 392 million | 292 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 145 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
| Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Shared memory | 1 | |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 14.37 GB / s | |
| Memory clock speed | 1796 MHz | |
| Memory type | DDR3 | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||

