Intel HD Graphics 4600 vs NVIDIA GeForce 510 OEM

Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 4600 and NVIDIA GeForce 510 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 4600

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 8 month(s) later
  • Around 20% higher texture fill rate: 5 GTexel / s vs 4.18 GTexel / s
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 22 nm vs 40 nm
  • 2.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 629 vs 255
  • Around 86% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 314 vs 169
  • 4.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 3211 vs 758
  • Around 36% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1702 vs 1254
  • Around 63% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2808 vs 1723
  • Around 36% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1702 vs 1254
  • Around 63% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2808 vs 1723
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 3 June 2013 vs 29 September 2011
Texture fill rate 5 GTexel / s vs 4.18 GTexel / s
Manufacturing process technology 22 nm vs 40 nm
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 629 vs 255
PassMark - G2D Mark 314 vs 169
Geekbench - OpenCL 3211 vs 758
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1702 vs 1254
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 2808 vs 1723
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1702 vs 1254
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 2808 vs 1723

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 510 OEM

  • Around 31% higher core clock speed: 523 MHz vs 400 MHz
  • 2.4x more pipelines: 48 vs 20
  • 2x better floating-point performance: 100.42 gflops vs 50 gflops
  • Around 80% lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 45 Watt
Core clock speed 523 MHz vs 400 MHz
Pipelines 48 vs 20
Floating-point performance 100.42 gflops vs 50 gflops
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 25 Watt vs 45 Watt

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 4600
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 510 OEM

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
629
255
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
314
169
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
3211
758
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1702
1254
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2808
1723
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1702
1254
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2808
1723
Name Intel HD Graphics 4600 NVIDIA GeForce 510 OEM
PassMark - G3D Mark 629 255
PassMark - G2D Mark 314 169
Geekbench - OpenCL 3211 758
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 8.844
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 171.17
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 1.115
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 10.385
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 12.361
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 988
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1702 1254
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 2808 1723
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 988
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1702 1254
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 2808 1723
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 194

Compare specifications (specs)

Intel HD Graphics 4600 NVIDIA GeForce 510 OEM

Essentials

Architecture Generation 7.5 Fermi 2.0
Code name Haswell GT2 GF119
Launch date 3 June 2013 29 September 2011
Place in performance rating 1350 1353
Type Laptop Desktop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1250 MHz
Core clock speed 400 MHz 523 MHz
Floating-point performance 50 gflops 100.42 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 22 nm 40 nm
Pipelines 20 48
Texture fill rate 5 GTexel / s 4.18 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 45 Watt 25 Watt
Transistor count 392 million 292 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 1.0 x16 PCIe 2.0 x16
Length 145 mm
Supplementary power connectors None

API support

DirectX 12.0 (11_1) 12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL 4.3 4.6

Memory

Memory bus width 64 / 128 Bit 64 Bit
Shared memory 1
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB
Memory bandwidth 14.37 GB / s
Memory clock speed 1796 MHz
Memory type DDR3

Technologies

Quick Sync