Intel HD Graphics 4600 vs NVIDIA GeForce 405M
Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 4600 and NVIDIA GeForce 405M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 4600
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- Around 3% higher texture fill rate: 5 GTexel / s vs 4.85 GTexel / s
- Around 25% higher pipelines: 20 vs 16
- Around 29% better floating-point performance: 50 gflops vs 38.78 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 22 nm vs 40 nm
Launch date | 3 June 2013 vs 5 January 2011 |
Texture fill rate | 5 GTexel / s vs 4.85 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 20 vs 16 |
Floating-point performance | 50 gflops vs 38.78 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm vs 40 nm |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 405M
- 3x more core clock speed: 1212 MHz vs 400 MHz
- 3.2x lower typical power consumption: 14 Watt vs 45 Watt
Core clock speed | 1212 MHz vs 400 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 14 Watt vs 45 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 4600
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 405M
Name | Intel HD Graphics 4600 | NVIDIA GeForce 405M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 630 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 314 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 3210 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 8.844 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 171.17 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.115 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 10.385 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 12.361 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 988 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1702 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2808 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 988 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1702 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2808 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 194 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel HD Graphics 4600 | NVIDIA GeForce 405M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 7.5 | Tesla 2.0 |
Code name | Haswell GT2 | GT218 |
Launch date | 3 June 2013 | 5 January 2011 |
Place in performance rating | 1359 | not rated |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1250 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 400 MHz | 1212 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 50 gflops | 38.78 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 20 | 16 |
Texture fill rate | 5 GTexel / s | 4.85 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt | 14 Watt |
Transistor count | 392 million | 260 million |
CUDA cores | 16 | |
Gigaflops | 73 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | DisplayPort, HDMI, VGA, Dual Link DVI, Single Link DVI |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12 API |
OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
Shared memory | 1 | 0 |
Memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB / s | |
Memory type | GDDR3, DDR3 | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync | ||
CUDA | ||
HybridPower | ||
Power management | 8.0 |