Intel HD Graphics 4600 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT Mac Edition
Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 4600 and NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT Mac Edition videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 4600
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 22 nm vs 65 nm
- 2.8x lower typical power consumption: 45 Watt vs 125 Watt
Launch date | 3 June 2013 vs 1 February 2008 |
Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm vs 65 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt vs 125 Watt |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT Mac Edition
- Around 50% higher core clock speed: 600 MHz vs 400 MHz
- 6.7x more texture fill rate: 33.6 GTexel / s vs 5 GTexel / s
- 5.6x more pipelines: 112 vs 20
- 6.7x better floating-point performance: 336.0 gflops vs 50 gflops
Core clock speed | 600 MHz vs 400 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 33.6 GTexel / s vs 5 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 112 vs 20 |
Floating-point performance | 336.0 gflops vs 50 gflops |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 4600
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT Mac Edition
Name | Intel HD Graphics 4600 | NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT Mac Edition |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 630 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 314 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 3210 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 8.844 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 171.17 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.115 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 10.385 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 12.361 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 988 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1702 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2808 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 988 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1702 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2808 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 194 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel HD Graphics 4600 | NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT Mac Edition | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 7.5 | Tesla |
Code name | Haswell GT2 | G92 |
Launch date | 3 June 2013 | 1 February 2008 |
Place in performance rating | 1359 | not rated |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1250 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 400 MHz | 600 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 50 gflops | 336.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm | 65 nm |
Pipelines | 20 | 112 |
Texture fill rate | 5 GTexel / s | 33.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt | 125 Watt |
Transistor count | 392 million | 754 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 229 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 4.3 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Shared memory | 1 | |
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | |
Memory bandwidth | 57.6 GB / s | |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR3 | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync |