Intel HD Graphics 530 vs NVIDIA GeForce4 MX 4000
Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 530 and NVIDIA GeForce4 MX 4000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 530
- Videocard is newer: launch date 11 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- Around 40% higher core clock speed: 350 MHz vs 250 MHz
- 25.2x more texture fill rate: 25.2 GTexel / s vs 1 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 150 nm
- 512x more maximum memory size: 64 GB vs 128 MB
- 199x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 995 vs 5
- Around 93% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 253 vs 131
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 September 2015 vs 14 December 2003 |
Core clock speed | 350 MHz vs 250 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 25.2 GTexel / s vs 1 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 150 nm |
Maximum memory size | 64 GB vs 128 MB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 995 vs 5 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 253 vs 131 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 530
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce4 MX 4000
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | Intel HD Graphics 530 | NVIDIA GeForce4 MX 4000 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 995 | 5 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 253 | 131 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4418 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 30.747 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 330.464 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.804 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 19.781 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 30.177 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1045 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2393 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1045 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2393 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 382 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel HD Graphics 530 | NVIDIA GeForce4 MX 4000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.0 | Celsius |
Code name | Skylake GT2 | NV18 A4 |
Launch date | 1 September 2015 | 14 December 2003 |
Place in performance rating | 1265 | 1215 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1150 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 350 MHz | 250 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 403.2 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 150 nm |
Pipelines | 24 | |
Texture fill rate | 25.2 GTexel / s | 1 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | |
Transistor count | 189 million | 29 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x VGA |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | AGP 8x |
Length | 168 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 8.0 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 1.3 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 64 GB | 128 MB |
Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory type | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / LPDDR4 | DDR |
Shared memory | 1 | |
Memory bandwidth | 2.656 GB / s | |
Memory clock speed | 332 MHz |