AMD Radeon 620 vs Intel HD Graphics 530
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon 620 and Intel HD Graphics 530 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon 620
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- 2.1x more core clock speed: 730 MHz vs 350 MHz
- 975.4x more texture fill rate: 24.58 GTexel/s vs 25.2 GTexel / s
- 16x more pipelines: 384 vs 24
- Around 91% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1991 vs 1045
- Around 91% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1991 vs 1045
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 13 May 2019 vs 1 September 2015 |
| Core clock speed | 730 MHz vs 350 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 24.58 GTexel/s vs 25.2 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 384 vs 24 |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1991 vs 1045 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1991 vs 1045 |
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 530
- Around 12% higher boost clock speed: 1150 MHz vs 1024 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 3.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 50 Watt
- 32x more maximum memory size: 64 GB vs 2 GB
- 3.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2393 vs 694
- 3.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2393 vs 694
- 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3346 vs 1116
- 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3346 vs 1116
- Around 23% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 253 vs 205
- Around 11% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 995 vs 897
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Boost clock speed | 1150 MHz vs 1024 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 50 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 64 GB vs 2 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2393 vs 694 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2393 vs 694 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 vs 1116 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 vs 1116 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 253 vs 205 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 995 vs 897 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon 620
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 530
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon 620 | Intel HD Graphics 530 |
|---|---|---|
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1991 | 1045 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1991 | 1045 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 694 | 2393 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 694 | 2393 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1116 | 3346 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1116 | 3346 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 205 | 253 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 897 | 995 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 4419 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 30.747 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 330.464 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.804 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 19.781 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 30.177 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 381 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon 620 | Intel HD Graphics 530 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Generation 9.0 |
| Code name | Polaris 24 | Skylake GT2 |
| Launch date | 13 May 2019 | 1 September 2015 |
| Place in performance rating | 1248 | 1265 |
| Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1024 MHz | 1150 MHz |
| Compute units | 6 | |
| Core clock speed | 730 MHz | 350 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 49.15 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 786.4 GFLOPS (1:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 786.4 GFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 384 | 24 |
| Pixel fill rate | 8.192 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 24.58 GTexel/s | 25.2 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Transistor count | 1550 million | 189 million |
| Floating-point performance | 403.2 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Width | IGP | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.3 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 64 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 14.40 GB/s | |
| Memory bus width | 64 bit | 64 / 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 900 MHz (1800 MHz effective) | |
| Memory type | DDR3 | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / LPDDR4 |
| Shared memory | 1 | |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon 620 with others
AMDRadeon 620 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 7800 GTX
AMDRadeon 620 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 6800 XT
AMDRadeon 620 vs
ATIRadeon X1600
AMDRadeon 620 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 640 Rev. 2
AMDRadeon 620 vs
NVIDIAGRID K180Q
AMDRadeon 620 vs
NVIDIAGRID M3-3020
