Intel HD Graphics 530 vs NVIDIA GRID K180Q
Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 530 and NVIDIA GRID K180Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 530
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 85% higher texture fill rate: 25.2 GTexel / s vs 13.6 GTexel / s
- Around 24% better floating-point performance: 403.2 gflops vs 326.4 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 8.7x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 130 Watt
- 64x more maximum memory size: 64 GB vs 1 GB
- Around 86% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 995 vs 534
- 2.2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 254 vs 113
- Around 37% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2393 vs 1744
- Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3346 vs 2688
- Around 37% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2393 vs 1744
- Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3346 vs 2688
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 1 September 2015 vs 28 June 2013 |
| Texture fill rate | 25.2 GTexel / s vs 13.6 GTexel / s |
| Floating-point performance | 403.2 gflops vs 326.4 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 130 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 64 GB vs 1 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 995 vs 534 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 254 vs 113 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2393 vs 1744 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 vs 2688 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2393 vs 1744 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 vs 2688 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GRID K180Q
- 2.4x more core clock speed: 850 MHz vs 350 MHz
- 8x more pipelines: 192 vs 24
- Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1201 vs 1045
- Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1201 vs 1045
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 850 MHz vs 350 MHz |
| Pipelines | 192 vs 24 |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1201 vs 1045 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1201 vs 1045 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 530
GPU 2: NVIDIA GRID K180Q
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel HD Graphics 530 | NVIDIA GRID K180Q |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 995 | 534 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 254 | 113 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 4397 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 30.747 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 330.464 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.804 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 19.781 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 30.177 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1045 | 1201 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2393 | 1744 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 | 2688 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1045 | 1201 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2393 | 1744 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 | 2688 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 384 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel HD Graphics 530 | NVIDIA GRID K180Q | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Generation 9.0 | Kepler |
| Code name | Skylake GT2 | GK107 |
| Launch date | 1 September 2015 | 28 June 2013 |
| Place in performance rating | 1248 | 1249 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $125 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1150 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 350 MHz | 850 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 403.2 gflops | 326.4 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 24 | 192 |
| Texture fill rate | 25.2 GTexel / s | 13.6 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 130 Watt |
| Transistor count | 189 million | 1,270 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 64 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory type | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / LPDDR4 | DDR3 |
| Shared memory | 1 | |
| Memory bandwidth | 28.51 GB / s | |
| Memory clock speed | 1782 MHz | |

