Intel HD Graphics 610 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M Mac Edition
Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 610 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M Mac Edition videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 610
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 9x lower typical power consumption: 5 Watt vs 45 Watt
- 64x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 512 MB
- 23.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1017 vs 43.2
- 14.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 464 vs 31.3
- 12.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 845 vs 70.1
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 30 August 2016 vs 12 July 2012 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 5 Watt vs 45 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 32 GB vs 512 MB |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1017 vs 43.2 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 464 vs 31.3 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 845 vs 70.1 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M Mac Edition
- 3x more core clock speed: 900 MHz vs 300 MHz
- Around 9% higher texture fill rate: 28.8 GTexel / s vs 26.4 GTexel / s
- 32x more pipelines: 384 vs 12
- Around 64% better floating-point performance: 691.2 gflops vs 422.4 gflops
- 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2550 vs 1017
- 4.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1938 vs 464
- 4.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3926 vs 845
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 900 MHz vs 300 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 28.8 GTexel / s vs 26.4 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 384 vs 12 |
| Floating-point performance | 691.2 gflops vs 422.4 gflops |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2550 vs 1017 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1938 vs 464 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3926 vs 845 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 610
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M Mac Edition
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel HD Graphics 610 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M Mac Edition |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 687 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 155 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 2439 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1017 | 2550 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 464 | 1938 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 845 | 3926 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1017 | 43.2 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 464 | 31.3 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 845 | 70.1 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 11.049 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 342.738 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.945 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 14.549 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 22.128 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel HD Graphics 610 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M Mac Edition | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Kepler |
| Code name | Kaby Lake GT1 | GK107 |
| Launch date | 30 August 2016 | 12 July 2012 |
| Place in performance rating | 1523 | 1526 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 422.4 gflops | 691.2 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 12 | 384 |
| Texture fill rate | 26.4 GTexel / s | 28.8 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 5 Watt | 45 Watt |
| Transistor count | 189 million | 1,270 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 32 GB | 512 MB |
| Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory type | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / DDR4 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 1 | |
| Memory bandwidth | 80.26 GB / s | |
| Memory clock speed | 5016 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare Intel HD Graphics 610 with others
IntelHD Graphics 610 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 9600 GS OEM
IntelHD Graphics 610 vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 2700M
IntelHD Graphics 610 vs
IntelGraphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 500
IntelHD Graphics 610 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 650M Mac Edition
IntelHD Graphics 610 vs
NVIDIAGRID K1
IntelHD Graphics 610 vs
IntelHD Graphics 505
