Intel HD Graphics 610 vs NVIDIA GRID K1

Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 610 and NVIDIA GRID K1 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

Intel HD Graphics 610

NVIDIA GRID K1

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 610

Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 5 month(s) later
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
26x lower typical power consumption: 5 Watt vs 130 Watt
2x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 4x 4 GB
Around 6% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 688 vs 651
Around 24% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2441 vs 1976
Around 31% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 464 vs 354
2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 845 vs 319
Around 31% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 464 vs 354
2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 845 vs 319

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	30 August 2016 vs 18 March 2013
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	5 Watt vs 130 Watt
Maximum memory size	32 GB vs 4x 4 GB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	688 vs 651
Geekbench - OpenCL	2441 vs 1976
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	464 vs 354
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	845 vs 319
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	464 vs 354
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	845 vs 319

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GRID K1

2.8x more core clock speed: 850 MHz vs 300 MHz
15.7x more texture fill rate: 4x 13.6 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 26.4 GTexel / s
64x more pipelines: 4x 192 vs 12
3.1x better floating-point performance: 4x 326.4 gflops vs 422.4 gflops
Around 67% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 259 vs 155
Around 22% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1237 vs 1017
Around 22% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1237 vs 1017

Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed	850 MHz vs 300 MHz
Texture fill rate	4x 13.6 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 26.4 GTexel / s
Pipelines	4x 192 vs 12
Floating-point performance	4x 326.4 gflops vs 422.4 gflops
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	259 vs 155
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	1237 vs 1017
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	1237 vs 1017

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 610
GPU 2: NVIDIA GRID K1

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

688

651

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

155

259

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

2441

1976

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1017

1237

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

464

354

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

845

319

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1017

1237

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

464

354

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

845

319

Name	Intel HD Graphics 610	NVIDIA GRID K1
PassMark - G3D Mark	688	651
PassMark - G2D Mark	155	259
Geekbench - OpenCL	2441	1976
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	1017	1237
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	464	354
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	845	319
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	1017	1237
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	464	354
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	845	319
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	0
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		4.591
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		169.864
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		0.336
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		8.734
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		10.43

Compare specifications (specs)

	Intel HD Graphics 610	NVIDIA GRID K1
Essentials
Architecture	Generation 9.5	Kepler
Code name	Kaby Lake GT1	GK107
Launch date	30 August 2016	18 March 2013
Place in performance rating	1523	1524
Type	Laptop	Workstation
Launch price (MSRP)		$4,140
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1100 MHz
Core clock speed	300 MHz	850 MHz
Floating-point performance	422.4 gflops	4x 326.4 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	12	4x 192
Texture fill rate	26.4 GTexel / s	4x 13.6 GTexel / s billion / sec
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	5 Watt	130 Watt
Transistor count	189 million	1,270 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x1	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length		267 mm
Supplementary power connectors		1x 6-pin
API support
DirectX	12.0 (12_1)	12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL	4.5	4.6
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	32 GB	4x 4 GB
Memory bus width	64 / 128 Bit	4x 128 Bit
Memory type	DDR3L / LPDDR3 / DDR4	DDR3
Shared memory	1
Memory bandwidth		4x 28.51 GB / s
Memory clock speed		1782 MHz
Technologies
Quick Sync