Intel HD Graphics 610 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M

Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 610 and NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 610

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 8 year(s) 0 month(s) later
  • 2.1x more texture fill rate: 26.4 GTexel / s vs 12.72 GTexel / s
  • 3.3x better floating-point performance: 422.4 gflops vs 127.2 gflops
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 65 nm
  • 13x lower typical power consumption: 5 Watt vs 65 Watt
  • 64x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 512 MB
  • Around 87% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 688 vs 367
  • 4.1x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 155 vs 38
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 30 August 2016 vs 14 August 2008
Texture fill rate 26.4 GTexel / s vs 12.72 GTexel / s
Floating-point performance 422.4 gflops vs 127.2 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm vs 65 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 5 Watt vs 65 Watt
Maximum memory size 32 GB vs 512 MB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 688 vs 367
PassMark - G2D Mark 155 vs 38

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M

  • Around 77% higher core clock speed: 530 MHz vs 300 MHz
  • 4x more pipelines: 48 vs 12
  • 2.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2376 vs 845
  • 2.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2376 vs 845
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 530 MHz vs 300 MHz
Pipelines 48 vs 12
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 2376 vs 845
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 2376 vs 845

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 610
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
688
367
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
155
38
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
845
2376
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
845
2376
Name Intel HD Graphics 610 NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M
PassMark - G3D Mark 688 367
PassMark - G2D Mark 155 38
Geekbench - OpenCL 2441
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1017
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 464
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 845 2376
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1017
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 464
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 845 2376
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 0

Compare specifications (specs)

Intel HD Graphics 610 NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M

Essentials

Architecture Generation 9.5 Tesla
Code name Kaby Lake GT1 G94
Launch date 30 August 2016 14 August 2008
Place in performance rating 1523 1521
Type Laptop Mobile workstation
Launch price (MSRP) $99.95
Price now $99.95
Value for money (0-100) 7.66

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1100 MHz
Core clock speed 300 MHz 530 MHz
Floating-point performance 422.4 gflops 127.2 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm 65 nm
Pipelines 12 48
Texture fill rate 26.4 GTexel / s 12.72 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 5 Watt 65 Watt
Transistor count 189 million 505 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x1 MXM-HE
Laptop size large

API support

DirectX 12.0 (12_1) 10.0
OpenGL 4.5 3.3

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 32 GB 512 MB
Memory bus width 64 / 128 Bit 256 Bit
Memory type DDR3L / LPDDR3 / DDR4 GDDR3
Shared memory 1 0
Memory bandwidth 51.1 GB / s
Memory clock speed 1598 MHz

Technologies

Quick Sync
PowerMizer 8.0
PureVideo HD