Intel HD Graphics 610 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M

Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 610 and NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

Intel HD Graphics 610

NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 610

Videocard is newer: launch date 8 year(s) 0 month(s) later
2.1x more texture fill rate: 26.4 GTexel / s vs 12.72 GTexel / s
3.3x better floating-point performance: 422.4 gflops vs 127.2 gflops
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 65 nm
13x lower typical power consumption: 5 Watt vs 65 Watt
64x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 512 MB
Around 87% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 691 vs 370
3.9x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 156 vs 40

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	30 August 2016 vs 14 August 2008
Texture fill rate	26.4 GTexel / s vs 12.72 GTexel / s
Floating-point performance	422.4 gflops vs 127.2 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm vs 65 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	5 Watt vs 65 Watt
Maximum memory size	32 GB vs 512 MB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	691 vs 370
PassMark - G2D Mark	156 vs 40

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M

Around 77% higher core clock speed: 530 MHz vs 300 MHz
4x more pipelines: 48 vs 12
2.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2376 vs 845
2.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2376 vs 845

Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed	530 MHz vs 300 MHz
Pipelines	48 vs 12
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	2376 vs 845
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	2376 vs 845

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 610
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

691

370

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

156

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

845

2376

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

845

2376

Name	Intel HD Graphics 610	NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M
PassMark - G3D Mark	691	370
PassMark - G2D Mark	156	40
Geekbench - OpenCL	2487
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	1017
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	464
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	845	2376
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	1017
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	464
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	845	2376
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	0

Compare specifications (specs)

	Intel HD Graphics 610	NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M
Essentials
Architecture	Generation 9.5	Tesla
Code name	Kaby Lake GT1	G94
Launch date	30 August 2016	14 August 2008
Place in performance rating	1519	1516
Type	Laptop	Mobile workstation
Launch price (MSRP)		$99.95
Price now		$99.95
Value for money (0-100)		7.66
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1100 MHz
Core clock speed	300 MHz	530 MHz
Floating-point performance	422.4 gflops	127.2 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	65 nm
Pipelines	12	48
Texture fill rate	26.4 GTexel / s	12.72 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	5 Watt	65 Watt
Transistor count	189 million	505 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x1	MXM-HE
Laptop size		large
API support
DirectX	12.0 (12_1)	10.0
OpenGL	4.5	3.3
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	32 GB	512 MB
Memory bus width	64 / 128 Bit	256 Bit
Memory type	DDR3L / LPDDR3 / DDR4	GDDR3
Shared memory	1	0
Memory bandwidth		51.1 GB / s
Memory clock speed		1598 MHz
Technologies
Quick Sync
PowerMizer 8.0
PureVideo HD