Intel Arc A380 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Max-Q
Comparative analysis of Intel Arc A380 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Max-Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, Geekbench - OpenCL.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Arc A380
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 month(s) later
- 2.4x more core clock speed: 2000 MHz vs 832 MHz
- Around 77% higher boost clock speed: 2050 MHz vs 1155 MHz
- Around 77% higher texture fill rate: 131.2 GTexel/s vs 73.92 GTexel/s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 6 nm vs 8 nm
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 4 GB
- Around 29% higher memory clock speed: 1937 MHz, 15.5 Gbps effective vs 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective
Launch date | 14 Jun 2022 vs 17 Dec 2021 |
Core clock speed | 2000 MHz vs 832 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 2050 MHz vs 1155 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 131.2 GTexel/s vs 73.92 GTexel/s |
Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm vs 8 nm |
Maximum memory size | 6 GB vs 4 GB |
Memory clock speed | 1937 MHz, 15.5 Gbps effective vs 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Max-Q
- 2x more pipelines: 2048 vs 1024
- 2.5x lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 75 Watt
Pipelines | 2048 vs 1024 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt vs 75 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Arc A380
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Max-Q
Name | Intel Arc A380 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Max-Q |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 606 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6242 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 808 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 38292 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Arc A380 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Max-Q | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 12.7 | Ampere |
Code name | DG2-128 | GA107 |
Launch date | 14 Jun 2022 | 17 Dec 2021 |
Place in performance rating | 313 | not rated |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 2050 MHz | 1155 MHz |
Core clock speed | 2000 MHz | 832 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm | 8 nm |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 8.397 TFLOPS (2:1) | 9.462 TFLOPS (2:1) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 4.198 TFLOPS | 4.731 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 1024 | 2048 |
Pixel fill rate | 65.60 GPixel/s | 36.96 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 131.2 GTexel/s | 73.92 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 30 Watt |
Transistor count | 7200 million | |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 147.8 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0 | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI 2.1, 2x DisplayPort 1.4a |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Dual-slot | |
Height | 42 mm, 1.7 inches | 35 mm, 1.4 inches |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Length | 222 mm, 8.7 inches | 229 mm, 9 inches |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 250 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | None |
Width | 114 mm, 4.5 inches | 113 mm, 4.4 inches |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | 3.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.6 | 6.7 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 186.0 GB/s | 96.00 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 96 bit | 64 bit |
Memory clock speed | 1937 MHz, 15.5 Gbps effective | 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |