Intel Arc A770M vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000

Comparative analysis of Intel Arc A770M and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel Arc A770M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 10 month(s) later
• Around 2% higher core clock speed: 1650 MHz vs 1620 MHz
• Around 13% higher boost clock speed: 2050 MHz vs 1815 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 6 nm vs 12 nm
• Around 67% lower typical power consumption: 120 Watt vs 200 Watt
• Around 5% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 739 vs 705

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000

• 7x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective
• Around 31% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 15652 vs 11965
• Around 18% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 105171 vs 89327
• 4.7x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 10685 vs 2278

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel Arc A770M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000

PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	739 705
PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	11965 15652
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	89327 105171
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	2278 10685

Compare specifications (specs)