Intel Arc A770M vs NVIDIA RTX A4000
Comparative analysis of Intel Arc A770M and NVIDIA RTX A4000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Arc A770M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- 2.2x more core clock speed: 1650 MHz vs 735 MHz
- Around 31% higher boost clock speed: 2050 MHz vs 1560 MHz
- Around 75% higher texture fill rate: 524.8 GTexel/s vs 299.5 GTexel/s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 6 nm vs 8 nm
- Around 17% lower typical power consumption: 120 Watt vs 140 Watt
- Around 14% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective vs 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective)
Launch date | 2022 vs 12 Apr 2021 |
Core clock speed | 1650 MHz vs 735 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 2050 MHz vs 1560 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 524.8 GTexel/s vs 299.5 GTexel/s |
Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm vs 8 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt vs 140 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective vs 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA RTX A4000
- Around 50% higher pipelines: 6144 vs 4096
- Around 36% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1004 vs 736
- Around 64% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 19479 vs 11860
- Around 37% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 121348 vs 88653
- Around 3% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 10991 vs 10650
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 6144 vs 4096 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1004 vs 736 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 19479 vs 11860 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 121348 vs 88653 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 10991 vs 10650 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Arc A770M
GPU 2: NVIDIA RTX A4000
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | Intel Arc A770M | NVIDIA RTX A4000 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 736 | 1004 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 11860 | 19479 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 88653 | 121348 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 10650 | 10991 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 420.465 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4156.52 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 32.297 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 162.131 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1895.111 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 22050 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 22050 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Arc A770M | NVIDIA RTX A4000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 12.7 | Ampere |
Code name | DG2-512 | GA104 |
Launch date | 2022 | 12 Apr 2021 |
Place in performance rating | 108 | 106 |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 2050 MHz | 1560 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1650 MHz | 735 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm | 8 nm |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 33.59 TFLOPS (2:1) | 19.17 TFLOPS (1:1) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 16.79 TFLOPS | 19.17 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 4096 | 6144 |
Pixel fill rate | 262.4 GPixel/s | 149.8 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 524.8 GTexel/s | 299.5 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt | 140 Watt |
Transistor count | 21700 million | 17400 million |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 599.0 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | 4x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | IGP | Single-slot |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
Length | 241 mm (9.5 inches) | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 300 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
Width | 112 mm (4.4 inches) | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.2 |
OpenCL | 3.0 | 3.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.6 | 6.6 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 16 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 512.0 GB/s | 448 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 256 bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |