Intel Arc Pro A50 vs AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid
Comparative analysis of Intel Arc Pro A50 and AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Arc Pro A50
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 42% higher core clock speed: 2000 MHz vs 1406 MHz
- Around 40% higher boost clock speed: 2350 MHz vs 1677 MHz
- 350.3x more texture fill rate: 150.4 GTexel/s vs 429.3 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 6 nm vs 14 nm
- 3x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 225 Watt
- Around 6% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective vs 1890 MHz
Launch date | 8 Aug 2022 vs 8 August 2017 |
Core clock speed | 2000 MHz vs 1406 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 2350 MHz vs 1677 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 150.4 GTexel/s vs 429.3 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm vs 14 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 225 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective vs 1890 MHz |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid
- 4x more pipelines: 4096 vs 1024
- Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 6 GB
Pipelines | 4096 vs 1024 |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 6 GB |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Arc Pro A50
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid
Name | Intel Arc Pro A50 | AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 540 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5224 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 32858 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7765 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Arc Pro A50 | AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 12.7 | GCN 5.0 |
Code name | DG2-128 | Vega 10 |
Launch date | 8 Aug 2022 | 8 August 2017 |
Place in performance rating | 253 | 256 |
Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 2350 MHz | 1677 MHz |
Core clock speed | 2000 MHz | 1406 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm | 14 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 1,203 GFLOPS (1:4) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 9.626 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 4.813 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 1024 | 4096 |
Pixel fill rate | 75.20 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 150.4 GTexel/s | 429.3 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 225 Watt |
Transistor count | 7200 million | |
Floating-point performance | 13,738 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0 | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 2x 8-pin |
Length | 267 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
Shader Model | 6.6 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 192.0 GB/s | 483.8 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 bit | 2048 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective | 1890 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | HBM2 |