NVIDIA T400 4GB vs Intel Arc Pro A50
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA T400 4GB and Intel Arc Pro A50 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA T400 4GB
- 2.5x lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 75 Watt
- Around 21% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 654 vs 540
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt vs 75 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 654 vs 540 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Arc Pro A50
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- 4.8x more core clock speed: 2000 MHz vs 420 MHz
- Around 65% higher boost clock speed: 2350 MHz vs 1425 MHz
- 4.4x more texture fill rate: 150.4 GTexel/s vs 34.20 GTexel/s
- 2.7x more pipelines: 1024 vs 384
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 6 nm vs 12 nm
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 4 GB
- Around 60% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective vs 1250 MHz, 10 Gbps effective
- Around 39% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5224 vs 3765
- Around 92% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 33073 vs 17225
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 8 Aug 2022 vs 6 May 2021 |
Core clock speed | 2000 MHz vs 420 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 2350 MHz vs 1425 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 150.4 GTexel/s vs 34.20 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 1024 vs 384 |
Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm vs 12 nm |
Maximum memory size | 6 GB vs 4 GB |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective vs 1250 MHz, 10 Gbps effective |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5224 vs 3765 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 33073 vs 17225 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA T400 4GB
GPU 2: Intel Arc Pro A50
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA T400 4GB | Intel Arc Pro A50 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 654 | 540 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3765 | 5224 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 17225 | 33073 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA T400 4GB | Intel Arc Pro A50 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | Generation 12.7 |
Code name | TU117 | DG2-128 |
Launch date | 6 May 2021 | 8 Aug 2022 |
Place in performance rating | 259 | 262 |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1425 MHz | 2350 MHz |
Core clock speed | 420 MHz | 2000 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 6 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 34.20 GFLOPS (1:32) | 1,203 GFLOPS (1:4) |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 2.189 TFLOPS (2:1) | 9.626 TFLOPS (2:1) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 1,094 GFLOPS | 4.813 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 384 | 1024 |
Pixel fill rate | 22.80 GPixel/s | 75.20 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 34.20 GTexel/s | 150.4 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt | 75 Watt |
Transistor count | 4700 million | 7200 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 3x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a | 4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0 |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Single-slot | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x8 |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 200 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | 3.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 (6.4) | 6.6 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 6 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 80.00 GB/s | 192.0 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 64 bit | 64 bit |
Memory clock speed | 1250 MHz, 10 Gbps effective | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |