Intel Iris Xe Graphics 80EU (Alder Lake) vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Xe Graphics 80EU (Alder Lake) and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Xe Graphics 80EU (Alder Lake)
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 10 nm vs 12 nm
- 3.8x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1150 vs 305
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 4 Jan 2022 vs 30 April 2019 |
Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm vs 12 nm |
Benchmarks | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1150 vs 305 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
- 5x more core clock speed: 1485 MHz vs 300 MHz
- Around 39% higher boost clock speed: 1665 MHz vs 1200 MHz
Core clock speed | 1485 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1665 MHz vs 1200 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Xe Graphics 80EU (Alder Lake)
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | Intel Iris Xe Graphics 80EU (Alder Lake) | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 |
---|---|---|
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1150 | 305 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7881 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 564 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 39165 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 134.765 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1316.075 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.799 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 94.915 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 573.418 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10959 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10959 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Iris Xe Graphics 80EU (Alder Lake) | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 12.2 | Turing |
Code name | Alder Lake GT1 | TU107 |
Launch date | 4 Jan 2022 | 30 April 2019 |
Place in performance rating | 1108 | 376 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $179 | |
Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz | 1665 MHz |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 1485 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm | 12 nm |
Pipelines | 640 | |
Pixel fill rate | 24.00 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 48.00 GTexel/s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
DisplayPort count | 1 | |
DisplayPort support | ||
HDMI | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | IGP | |
Interface | Ring Bus | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12.0 |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.6 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | System Shared | |
Memory bandwidth | System Dependent | |
Memory bus width | System Shared | |
Memory clock speed | System Shared | 8000 MHz |
Memory type | System Shared |