Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 vs AMD Radeon HD 7610M

Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 and AMD Radeon HD 7610M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 11 month(s) later
  • 2.5x better floating-point performance: 883 gflops vs 360.0 gflops
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
  • Around 33% lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 20 Watt
  • 32x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 1 GB
  • 2.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1590 vs 632
  • Around 33% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 7012 vs 5257
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 3 January 2017 vs 7 January 2012
Floating-point performance 883 gflops vs 360.0 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm vs 40 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt vs 20 Watt
Maximum memory size 32 GB vs 1 GB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 1590 vs 632
Geekbench - OpenCL 7012 vs 5257
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3340 vs 3339
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3340 vs 3339

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7610M

  • Around 50% higher core clock speed: 450 MHz vs 300 MHz
  • 8.3x more pipelines: 400 vs 48
  • Around 27% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 479 vs 377
  • Around 68% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2632 vs 1564
  • Around 68% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2632 vs 1564
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 450 MHz vs 300 MHz
Pipelines 400 vs 48
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 479 vs 377
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 2632 vs 1564
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 2632 vs 1564

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7610M

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
1590
632
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
377
479
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
7012
5257
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1564
2632
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1564
2632
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3340
3339
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3340
3339
Name Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 AMD Radeon HD 7610M
PassMark - G3D Mark 1590 632
PassMark - G2D Mark 377 479
Geekbench - OpenCL 7012 5257
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 2652
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 2652
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1564 2632
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1564 2632
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3340 3339
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3340 3339

Compare specifications (specs)

Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 AMD Radeon HD 7610M

Essentials

Architecture Generation 9.5 TeraScale 2
Code name Kaby Lake GT3e Whistler
Launch date 3 January 2017 7 January 2012
Place in performance rating 851 667
Type Laptop Laptop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1150 MHz
Core clock speed 300 MHz 450 MHz
Floating-point performance 883 gflops 360.0 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm 40 nm
Pipelines 48 400
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt 20 Watt
Transistor count 189 million 716 million
Texture fill rate 9 GTexel / s

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x1 PCIe 2.0 x16
Laptop size medium sized

API support

DirectX 12.0 (12_1) 11.2 (11_0)
OpenGL 4.5 4.4

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 32 GB 1 GB
Memory bus width 64 / 128 Bit 128 Bit
Memory type DDR3L / LPDDR3 / DDR4 DDR3
Shared memory 1 0
Memory bandwidth 25.6 GB / s
Memory clock speed 1600 MHz

Technologies

Quick Sync