Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 vs AMD FirePro M6100
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 and AMD FirePro M6100 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 16x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 22% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 368 vs 302
- Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3340 vs 2517
- Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3340 vs 2517
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 3 January 2017 vs 16 October 2013 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 32 GB vs 2 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 368 vs 302 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3340 vs 2517 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3340 vs 2517 |
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro M6100
- 3.6x more core clock speed: 1075 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 16x more pipelines: 768 vs 48
- Around 87% better floating-point performance: 1,651 gflops vs 883 gflops
- Around 38% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2195 vs 1585
- 7.4x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 52486 vs 7093
- Around 71% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4537 vs 2652
- Around 71% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4537 vs 2652
- Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1803 vs 1564
- Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1803 vs 1564
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1075 MHz vs 300 MHz |
| Pipelines | 768 vs 48 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,651 gflops vs 883 gflops |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2195 vs 1585 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 52486 vs 7093 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4537 vs 2652 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4537 vs 2652 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1803 vs 1564 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1803 vs 1564 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650
GPU 2: AMD FirePro M6100
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 | AMD FirePro M6100 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1585 | 2195 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 368 | 302 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 7093 | 52486 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2652 | 4537 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2652 | 4537 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1564 | 1803 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1564 | 1803 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3340 | 2517 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3340 | 2517 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 39.059 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 750.731 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.395 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 57.283 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 166.915 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 | AMD FirePro M6100 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Generation 9.5 | GCN 2.0 |
| Code name | Kaby Lake GT3e | Saturn |
| Launch date | 3 January 2017 | 16 October 2013 |
| Place in performance rating | 857 | 859 |
| Type | Laptop | Mobile workstation |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1150 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 1075 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 883 gflops | 1,651 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 48 | 768 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | |
| Transistor count | 189 million | 2,080 million |
| Texture fill rate | 51.6 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 32 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory type | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / DDR4 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 1 | 0 |
| Memory bandwidth | 88 GB / s | |
| Memory clock speed | 5500 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
| AppAcceleration | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 with others
IntelIris Plus Graphics 650 vs
ATIMobility Radeon X1450
IntelIris Plus Graphics 650 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 770M
IntelIris Plus Graphics 650 vs
AMDFirePro M6100
IntelIris Plus Graphics 650 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 810A
IntelIris Plus Graphics 650 vs
AMDRadeon R9 M390
IntelIris Plus Graphics 650 vs
AMDRadeon Pro WX 3200
