AMD Radeon RX 550 vs Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 550 and Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 550
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 month(s) later
- 3.7x more core clock speed: 1100 MHz vs 300 MHz
- Around 3% higher boost clock speed: 1183 MHz vs 1150 MHz
- 10.7x more pipelines: 512 vs 48
- Around 71% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2730 vs 1594
- Around 33% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 483 vs 362
- Around 64% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 11662 vs 7093
- Around 69% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4485 vs 2652
- Around 69% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4485 vs 2652
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 18 April 2017 vs 3 January 2017 |
Core clock speed | 1100 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1183 MHz vs 1150 MHz |
Pipelines | 512 vs 48 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2730 vs 1594 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 483 vs 362 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 11662 vs 7093 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4485 vs 2652 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4485 vs 2652 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650
- 735.8x better floating-point performance: 883 gflops vs 1.2 TFLOPs
- 3.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 50 Watt
- 8x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 4 GB
- Around 66% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1564 vs 940
- Around 55% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3340 vs 2158
- Around 66% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1564 vs 940
- Around 55% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3340 vs 2158
Specifications (specs) | |
Floating-point performance | 883 gflops vs 1.2 TFLOPs |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 50 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 32 GB vs 4 GB |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1564 vs 940 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3340 vs 2158 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1564 vs 940 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3340 vs 2158 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 550
GPU 2: Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 550 | Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2730 | 1594 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 483 | 362 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 11662 | 7093 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 33.507 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1037.305 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.064 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 52.533 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 140.911 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4485 | 2652 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 940 | 1564 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2158 | 3340 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4485 | 2652 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 940 | 1564 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2158 | 3340 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1199 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 550 | Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Generation 9.5 |
Code name | Lexa | Kaby Lake GT3e |
Design | Radeon RX 500 Series | |
GCN generation | 4th Gen | |
Launch date | 18 April 2017 | 3 January 2017 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $79 | |
Place in performance rating | 872 | 873 |
Price now | $75 | |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Value for money (0-100) | 59.51 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1183 MHz | 1150 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1100 MHz | 300 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1.2 TFLOPs | 883 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 14 nm |
Pipelines | 512 | 48 |
Texture fill rate | 37.86 GTexel / s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 15 Watt |
Transistor count | 2,200 million | 189 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
Length | 145 mm | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 400 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 32 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 112 GB/s | |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 64 / 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / DDR4 |
Shared memory | 1 | |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
FreeSync | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
LiquidVR | ||
PowerTune | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
Quick Sync |