AMD Radeon RX 550 vs Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 550 and Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 550

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 3 month(s) later
  • 3.7x more core clock speed: 1100 MHz vs 300 MHz
  • Around 3% higher boost clock speed: 1183 MHz vs 1150 MHz
  • 10.7x more pipelines: 512 vs 48
  • Around 71% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2713 vs 1590
  • Around 29% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 488 vs 377
  • Around 67% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 11719 vs 7012
  • Around 69% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4485 vs 2652
  • Around 69% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4485 vs 2652
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 18 April 2017 vs 3 January 2017
Core clock speed 1100 MHz vs 300 MHz
Boost clock speed 1183 MHz vs 1150 MHz
Pipelines 512 vs 48
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 2713 vs 1590
PassMark - G2D Mark 488 vs 377
Geekbench - OpenCL 11719 vs 7012
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 4485 vs 2652
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 4485 vs 2652

Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650

  • 735.8x better floating-point performance: 883 gflops vs 1.2 TFLOPs
  • 3.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 50 Watt
  • 8x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 4 GB
  • Around 66% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1564 vs 940
  • Around 55% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3340 vs 2158
  • Around 66% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1564 vs 940
  • Around 55% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3340 vs 2158
Specifications (specs)
Floating-point performance 883 gflops vs 1.2 TFLOPs
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt vs 50 Watt
Maximum memory size 32 GB vs 4 GB
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1564 vs 940
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3340 vs 2158
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1564 vs 940
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3340 vs 2158

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 550
GPU 2: Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
2713
1590
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
488
377
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
11719
7012
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
4485
2652
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
940
1564
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2158
3340
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
4485
2652
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
940
1564
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2158
3340
Name AMD Radeon RX 550 Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650
PassMark - G3D Mark 2713 1590
PassMark - G2D Mark 488 377
Geekbench - OpenCL 11719 7012
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 33.507
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 1037.305
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 3.064
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 52.533
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 140.911
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 4485 2652
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 940 1564
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 2158 3340
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 4485 2652
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 940 1564
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 2158 3340
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 1200

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon RX 550 Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650

Essentials

Architecture GCN 4.0 Generation 9.5
Code name Lexa Kaby Lake GT3e
Design Radeon RX 500 Series
GCN generation 4th Gen
Launch date 18 April 2017 3 January 2017
Launch price (MSRP) $79
Place in performance rating 850 851
Price now $75
Type Desktop Laptop
Value for money (0-100) 59.51

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1183 MHz 1150 MHz
Core clock speed 1100 MHz 300 MHz
Floating-point performance 1.2 TFLOPs 883 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm 14 nm
Pipelines 512 48
Texture fill rate 37.86 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 50 Watt 15 Watt
Transistor count 2,200 million 189 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort No outputs
DisplayPort support
Dual-link DVI support
HDMI
VGA

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x8 PCIe 3.0 x1
Length 145 mm
Recommended system power (PSU) 400 Watt
Supplementary power connectors None

API support

DirectX 12 12.0 (12_1)
OpenCL 2.0
OpenGL 4.5 4.5
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 32 GB
Memory bandwidth 112 GB/s
Memory bus width 128 bit 64 / 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 7000 MHz
Memory type GDDR5 DDR3L / LPDDR3 / DDR4
Shared memory 1

Technologies

4K H264 Decode
4K H264 Encode
AMD Eyefinity
AMD Radeon™ Chill
AMD Radeon™ ReLive
AppAcceleration
FreeSync
H265/HEVC Decode
H265/HEVC Encode
HDMI 4K Support
LiquidVR
PowerTune
TrueAudio
Unified Video Decoder (UVD)
Video Code Engine (VCE)
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR)
Quick Sync