Intel Iris Pro Graphics P580 vs AMD Radeon HD 7610M
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Pro Graphics P580 and AMD Radeon HD 7610M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Pro Graphics P580
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
- Around 33% lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 20 Watt
- 64x more maximum memory size: 64 GB vs 1 GB
- 3.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2231 vs 632
- Around 6% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 509 vs 479
- Around 90% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 10003 vs 5257
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 September 2015 vs 7 January 2012 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 20 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 64 GB vs 1 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2231 vs 632 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 509 vs 479 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 10003 vs 5257 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7610M
- Around 50% higher core clock speed: 450 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 5.6x more pipelines: 400 vs 72
- Around 58% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2632 vs 1671
- Around 58% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2632 vs 1671
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3339 vs 3175
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3339 vs 3175
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 450 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Pipelines | 400 vs 72 |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2632 vs 1671 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2632 vs 1671 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3339 vs 3175 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3339 vs 3175 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Pro Graphics P580
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7610M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | Intel Iris Pro Graphics P580 | AMD Radeon HD 7610M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2231 | 632 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 509 | 479 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 10003 | 5257 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1671 | 2632 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1671 | 2632 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3175 | 3339 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3175 | 3339 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Iris Pro Graphics P580 | AMD Radeon HD 7610M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.0 | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | Skylake GT4e | Whistler |
Launch date | 1 September 2015 | 7 January 2012 |
Place in performance rating | 665 | 667 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1000 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 450 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 72 | 400 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 20 Watt |
Transistor count | 189 million | 716 million |
Floating-point performance | 360.0 gflops | |
Texture fill rate | 9 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 11.2 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 64 GB | 1 GB |
Memory type | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / DDR4 | DDR3 |
Shared memory | 1 | 0 |
Memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync |