Intel Iris Pro Graphics P580 vs NVIDIA Tesla C2070
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Pro Graphics P580 and NVIDIA Tesla C2070 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Pro Graphics P580
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
- 15.9x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 238 Watt
- 10.7x more maximum memory size: 64 GB vs 6 GB
- Around 3% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 10056 vs 9716
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 1 September 2015 vs 25 July 2011 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 40 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 238 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 64 GB vs 6 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 10056 vs 9716 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla C2070
- Around 92% higher core clock speed: 575 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 6.2x more pipelines: 448 vs 72
- Around 69% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3121 vs 1845
- Around 3% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 462 vs 448
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3710 vs 1671
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3710 vs 1671
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3351 vs 3175
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3351 vs 3175
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 575 MHz vs 300 MHz |
| Pipelines | 448 vs 72 |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3121 vs 1845 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 462 vs 448 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3710 vs 1671 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3710 vs 1671 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 vs 3175 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 vs 3175 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Pro Graphics P580
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla C2070
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel Iris Pro Graphics P580 | NVIDIA Tesla C2070 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1845 | 3121 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 448 | 462 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 10056 | 9716 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1671 | 3710 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1671 | 3710 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3175 | 3351 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3175 | 3351 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 26.223 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 908.754 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.015 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 43.519 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 93.344 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3245 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3245 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Iris Pro Graphics P580 | NVIDIA Tesla C2070 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Generation 9.0 | Fermi |
| Code name | Skylake GT4e | GF100 |
| Launch date | 1 September 2015 | 25 July 2011 |
| Place in performance rating | 749 | 750 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1000 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 575 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 72 | 448 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 238 Watt |
| Transistor count | 189 million | 3,100 million |
| Floating-point performance | 1,030.4 gflops | |
| Texture fill rate | 32.2 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 248 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 64 GB | 6 GB |
| Memory type | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / DDR4 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 1 | |
| Memory bandwidth | 144.0 GB / s | |
| Memory bus width | 384 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 3000 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare Intel Iris Pro Graphics P580 with others
IntelIris Pro Graphics P580 vs
NVIDIAGeForce FX 5100
IntelIris Pro Graphics P580 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 6700 XL
IntelIris Pro Graphics P580 vs
ATIRadeon X550 XTX
IntelIris Pro Graphics P580 vs
ATIRadeon HD 5850
IntelIris Pro Graphics P580 vs
NVIDIATesla C2070
IntelIris Pro Graphics P580 vs
IntelUHD Graphics 750
