Intel Iris Pro Graphics P580 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Pro Graphics P580 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Pro Graphics P580
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 20x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 300 Watt
- 16x more maximum memory size: 64 GB vs 4 GB (4 GB per GPU) GDDR5
- Around 90% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3175 vs 1673
- Around 90% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3175 vs 1673
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 September 2015 vs 3 May 2012 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 300 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 64 GB vs 4 GB (4 GB per GPU) GDDR5 |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3175 vs 1673 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3175 vs 1673 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690
- 3.1x more core clock speed: 915 MHz vs 300 MHz
- Around 2% higher boost clock speed: 1019 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- 42.7x more pipelines: 2x 1536 vs 72
- 3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5467 vs 1845
- Around 5% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 471 vs 448
- Around 65% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 16577 vs 10056
- Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1849 vs 1671
- Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1849 vs 1671
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 915 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1019 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
Pipelines | 2x 1536 vs 72 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5467 vs 1845 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 471 vs 448 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 16577 vs 10056 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1849 vs 1671 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1849 vs 1671 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Pro Graphics P580
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | Intel Iris Pro Graphics P580 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1845 | 5467 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 448 | 471 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 10056 | 16577 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1671 | 1849 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1671 | 1849 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3175 | 1673 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3175 | 1673 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 46.352 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 930.114 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.656 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 29.836 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 97.861 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6875 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6875 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Iris Pro Graphics P580 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.0 | Kepler |
Code name | Skylake GT4e | GK104 |
Launch date | 1 September 2015 | 3 May 2012 |
Place in performance rating | 746 | 749 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $999 | |
Price now | $999 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 7.01 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1000 MHz | 1019 MHz |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 915 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 72 | 2x 1536 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 300 Watt |
Transistor count | 189 million | 3,540 million |
CUDA cores | 3072 | |
Floating-point performance | 2x 3,130 gflops | |
Texture fill rate | 234 billion / sec | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 3x DVI, 1x mini-DisplayPort, Two Dual Link DVI-I. One Dual link DVI-D. One Mini... |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
G-SYNC support | ||
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Length | 11.0" (27.9 cm) | |
SLI options | Quad | |
Supplementary power connectors | Two 8-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.2 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 64 GB | 4 GB (4 GB per GPU) GDDR5 |
Memory type | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / DDR4 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 1 | |
Memory bandwidth | 384 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 512-bit (256-bit per GPU) | |
Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync | ||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision Live | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
CUDA | ||
DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
FXAA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
SLI | ||
TXAA |