Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EU vs AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 Mobile
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EU and AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 Mobile videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EU
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- 1692.3x more texture fill rate: 88.00 GTexel/s vs 52 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 10 nm vs 14 nm
Launch date | 2 Sep 2020 vs 26 October 2017 |
Texture fill rate | 88.00 GTexel/s vs 52 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm vs 14 nm |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 Mobile
- Around 18% higher boost clock speed: 1300 MHz vs 1100 MHz
- Around 50% lower typical power consumption: 10 Watt vs 15 Watt
Boost clock speed | 1300 MHz vs 1100 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt vs 15 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EU
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 Mobile
Name | Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EU | AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 Mobile |
---|---|---|
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1243 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1633 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 373 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 10258 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 29.977 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 309.874 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.177 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 35.847 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 167.399 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2315 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3162 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3339 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2315 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3162 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3339 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EU | AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 Mobile | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 12.0 | GCN 5.0 |
Code name | Tiger Lake GT2 | Raven |
Launch date | 2 Sep 2020 | 26 October 2017 |
Place in performance rating | 1056 | 912 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz | 1300 MHz |
Compute units | 80 | |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 300 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm | 14 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 352.0 GFLOPS | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 2.816 TFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 1408 GFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 640 | 640 |
Pixel fill rate | 22.00 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 88.00 GTexel/s | 52 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 10 Watt |
Floating-point performance | 1,664 gflops | |
Transistor count | 4,940 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | IGP |
Width | IGP | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 2.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 256 MB | |
Memory bandwidth | 12.8 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory type | DDR4 |