Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EU vs Intel UHD Graphics 600
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EU and Intel UHD Graphics 600 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EU
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- Around 50% higher core clock speed: 300 MHz vs 200 MHz
- Around 47% higher boost clock speed: 1100 MHz vs 750 MHz
- 53.3x more pipelines: 640 vs 12
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 10 nm vs 14 nm
Launch date | 2 Sep 2020 vs 11 December 2017 |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz vs 200 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz vs 750 MHz |
Pipelines | 640 vs 12 |
Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm vs 14 nm |
Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 600
- 3x lower typical power consumption: 5 Watt vs 15 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 5 Watt vs 15 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EU
GPU 2: Intel UHD Graphics 600
Name | Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EU | Intel UHD Graphics 600 |
---|---|---|
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1243 | 0 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 318 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 92 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1004 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 5.952 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 56.77 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.427 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 5.876 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 6.882 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 476 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1000 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1701 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 476 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1000 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1701 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EU | Intel UHD Graphics 600 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 12.0 | Generation 9.5 |
Code name | Tiger Lake GT2 | Gemini Lake GT1 |
Launch date | 2 Sep 2020 | 11 December 2017 |
Place in performance rating | 1056 | 1624 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz | 750 MHz |
Compute units | 80 | |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 200 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm | 14 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 352.0 GFLOPS | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 2.816 TFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 1408 GFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 640 | 12 |
Pixel fill rate | 22.00 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 88.00 GTexel/s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 5 Watt |
Transistor count | 189 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
Width | IGP | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 2.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | |
Memory type | DDR4 / LPDDR4 | |
Shared memory | 1 | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync |