Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EU vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EU and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EU
- Videocard is newer: launch date 12 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- 2384.8x more texture fill rate: 88.00 GTexel/s vs 36.9 billion / sec
- 3.3x more pipelines: 640 vs 192
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 10 nm vs 65 nm
- 12.1x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 182 Watt
Launch date | 2 Sep 2020 vs 16 June 2008 |
Texture fill rate | 88.00 GTexel/s vs 36.9 billion / sec |
Pipelines | 640 vs 192 |
Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm vs 65 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 182 Watt |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260
- 4.1x more core clock speed: 1242 MHz vs 300 MHz
Core clock speed | 1242 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EU
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260
Name | Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EU | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 |
---|---|---|
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1243 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1208 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 53 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 19512 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 8.664 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 477.327 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.906 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 29.525 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3342 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3342 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EU | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 12.0 | Tesla 2.0 |
Code name | Tiger Lake GT2 | GT200 |
Launch date | 2 Sep 2020 | 16 June 2008 |
Place in performance rating | 1056 | 1396 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $449 | |
Price now | $95.38 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 13.70 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz | |
Compute units | 80 | |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 1242 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm | 65 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 352.0 GFLOPS | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 2.816 TFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 1408 GFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 640 | 192 |
Pixel fill rate | 22.00 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 88.00 GTexel/s | 36.9 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 182 Watt |
CUDA cores | 192 | |
Floating-point performance | 476.9 gflops | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | |
Transistor count | 1,400 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video, Dual Link DVIHDTV |
Audio input for HDMI | S / PDIF | |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Width | IGP | |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | |
SLI options | 2-way3-way | |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 10.0 |
OpenCL | 2.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 2.1 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 896 MB | |
Memory bandwidth | 111.9 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 448 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 999 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR3 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA | ||
SLI |