Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU vs NVIDIA Quadro M1200 Mobile
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU and NVIDIA Quadro M1200 Mobile videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- 2415.4x more texture fill rate: 105.6 GTexel/s vs 43.72 GTexel / s
- Around 20% higher pipelines: 768 vs 640
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 10 nm vs 28 nm
- 3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 45 Watt
Launch date | 2 Sep 2020 vs 11 January 2017 |
Texture fill rate | 105.6 GTexel/s vs 43.72 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 768 vs 640 |
Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 45 Watt |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M1200 Mobile
- 3.6x more core clock speed: 1093 MHz vs 300 MHz
Core clock speed | 1093 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro M1200 Mobile
Name | Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU | NVIDIA Quadro M1200 Mobile |
---|---|---|
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 142 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3217 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 312 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 10582 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 52.821 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 793.297 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.631 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 48.966 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 163.204 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4941 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2645 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4941 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2645 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU | NVIDIA Quadro M1200 Mobile | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 12.0 | Maxwell |
Code name | Tiger Lake GT2 | GM107 |
Launch date | 2 Sep 2020 | 11 January 2017 |
Place in performance rating | 1698 | 759 |
Type | Laptop | Mobile workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz | |
Compute units | 96 | |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 1093 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 422.4 GFLOPS | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 3.379 TFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 1.690 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 768 | 640 |
Pixel fill rate | 26.40 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 105.6 GTexel/s | 43.72 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 45 Watt |
Floating-point performance | 1,399 gflops | |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | MXM-A (3.0) |
Width | IGP | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenCL | 2.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 80.19 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR5 |