Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 10 nm vs 12 nm
- 6.4x lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 160 Watt
| Launch date | 31 Oct 2020 vs 7 January 2019 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm vs 12 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt vs 160 Watt |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
- 4.6x more core clock speed: 1365 MHz vs 300 MHz
- Around 2% higher boost clock speed: 1680 MHz vs 1650 MHz
- 2.5x more pipelines: 1920 vs 768
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 4 GB
- 6.6x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 2133 MHz (4.3 Gbps effective)
- 5x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 71402 vs 14238
- 2.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20094 vs 6889
- 2.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20094 vs 6889
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 7442 vs 3462
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 7442 vs 3462
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6714 vs 3214
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6714 vs 3214
- 2.4x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 746 vs 311
- 7.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 14119 vs 1972
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1365 MHz vs 300 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1680 MHz vs 1650 MHz |
| Pipelines | 1920 vs 768 |
| Maximum memory size | 6 GB vs 4 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 2133 MHz (4.3 Gbps effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 71402 vs 14238 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20094 vs 6889 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20094 vs 6889 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 7442 vs 3462 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 7442 vs 3462 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6714 vs 3214 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6714 vs 3214 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 746 vs 311 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 14119 vs 1972 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
| Name | Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 14238 | 71402 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6889 | 20094 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6889 | 20094 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3462 | 7442 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3462 | 7442 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3214 | 6714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3214 | 6714 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 311 | 746 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1972 | 14119 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 217.04 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3119.736 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 21.707 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 133.975 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1141.283 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1242 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Generation 12.1 | Turing |
| Code name | DG1 | TU106 |
| Launch date | 31 Oct 2020 | 7 January 2019 |
| Place in performance rating | 523 | 161 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $349 | |
| Price now | $349.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 62.74 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1650 MHz | 1680 MHz |
| Compute units | 96 | |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 1365 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 633.6 GFLOPS (1:4) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 5.069 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 2.534 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 768 | 1920 |
| Pixel fill rate | 39.60 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 79.20 GTexel/s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt | 160 Watt |
| Transistor count | 10,800 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
| DisplayPort count | 2 | |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| HDMI | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Width | IGP | |
| Length | 229 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12 |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 6 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 68.26 GB/s | |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 192 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2133 MHz (4.3 Gbps effective) | 14000 MHz |
| Memory type | LPDDR4X | GDDR6 |

