Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX vs NVIDIA GeForce MX450
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX and NVIDIA GeForce MX450 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 month(s) later
- Around 5% higher boost clock speed: 1650 MHz vs 1575 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 10 nm vs 12 nm
- 2x lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 50 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6889 vs 6326
- Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6889 vs 6326
- Around 1% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 311 vs 307
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 31 Oct 2020 vs 1 Aug 2020 |
| Boost clock speed | 1650 MHz vs 1575 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm vs 12 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt vs 50 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6889 vs 6326 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6889 vs 6326 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 311 vs 307 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX450
- 4.7x more core clock speed: 1395 MHz vs 300 MHz
- Around 27% higher texture fill rate: 100.8 GTexel/s vs 79.20 GTexel/s
- Around 17% higher pipelines: 896 vs 768
- 4.7x more memory clock speed: 10002 MHz vs 2133 MHz (4.3 Gbps effective)
- 2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 28933 vs 14238
- Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3710 vs 3462
- Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3710 vs 3462
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3354 vs 3214
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3354 vs 3214
- Around 90% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3750 vs 1972
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1395 MHz vs 300 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 100.8 GTexel/s vs 79.20 GTexel/s |
| Pipelines | 896 vs 768 |
| Memory clock speed | 10002 MHz vs 2133 MHz (4.3 Gbps effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 28933 vs 14238 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3710 vs 3462 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3710 vs 3462 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3354 vs 3214 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3354 vs 3214 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3750 vs 1972 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce MX450
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
| Name | Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX | NVIDIA GeForce MX450 |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 14238 | 28933 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6889 | 6326 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6889 | 6326 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3462 | 3710 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3462 | 3710 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3214 | 3354 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3214 | 3354 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 311 | 307 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1972 | 3750 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 849.116 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2114 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX | NVIDIA GeForce MX450 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Generation 12.1 | Turing |
| Code name | DG1 | N17S-G5 / GP107-670-A1 |
| Launch date | 31 Oct 2020 | 1 Aug 2020 |
| Place in performance rating | 523 | 524 |
| Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1650 MHz | 1575 MHz |
| Compute units | 96 | |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 1395 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 633.6 GFLOPS (1:4) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 5.069 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 2.534 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 768 | 896 |
| Pixel fill rate | 39.60 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 79.20 GTexel/s | 100.8 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt | 50 Watt |
| Transistor count | 4700 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 4.0 x4 |
| Width | IGP | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.1 |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.5 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 68.26 GB/s | 64.03 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2133 MHz (4.3 Gbps effective) | 10002 MHz |
| Memory type | LPDDR4X | GDDR5, GDDR6 |
Technologies |
||
| GPU Boost | ||
| Optimus | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX with others
IntelIris Xe Graphics MAX vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 565v
IntelIris Xe Graphics MAX vs
AMDRadeon HD 7850
IntelIris Xe Graphics MAX vs
AMDRadeon HD 7870 XT
IntelIris Xe Graphics MAX vs
AMDRadeon R9 370X
IntelIris Xe Graphics MAX vs
NVIDIAQuadro P1000 Mobile
IntelIris Xe Graphics MAX vs
NVIDIAGeForce MX450
