Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX vs NVIDIA Quadro P1000 Mobile
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX and NVIDIA Quadro P1000 Mobile videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- Around 11% higher boost clock speed: 1650 MHz vs 1493 MHz
- 1337.8x more texture fill rate: 79.20 GTexel/s vs 59.2 GTexel / s
- Around 20% higher pipelines: 768 vs 640
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 10 nm vs 14 nm
- Around 88% lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 47 Watt
- Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6889 vs 5923
- Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6889 vs 5923
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 31 Oct 2020 vs 7 February 2017 |
| Boost clock speed | 1650 MHz vs 1493 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 79.20 GTexel/s vs 59.2 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 768 vs 640 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm vs 14 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt vs 47 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6889 vs 5923 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6889 vs 5923 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P1000 Mobile
- 4.3x more core clock speed: 1303 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 2.8x more memory clock speed: 6008 MHz vs 2133 MHz (4.3 Gbps effective)
- Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3717 vs 3462
- Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3717 vs 3462
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 vs 3214
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 vs 3214
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1303 MHz vs 300 MHz |
| Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz vs 2133 MHz (4.3 Gbps effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 vs 3462 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 vs 3462 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 vs 3214 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 vs 3214 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P1000 Mobile
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX | NVIDIA Quadro P1000 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 14127 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6889 | 5923 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6889 | 5923 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3462 | 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3462 | 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3214 | 3356 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3214 | 3356 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 311 | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1972 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX | NVIDIA Quadro P1000 Mobile | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Generation 12.1 | Pascal |
| Code name | DG1 | GP107 |
| Launch date | 31 Oct 2020 | 7 February 2017 |
| Place in performance rating | 520 | 533 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1650 MHz | 1493 MHz |
| Compute units | 96 | |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 1303 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm | 14 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 633.6 GFLOPS (1:4) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 5.069 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 2.534 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 768 | 640 |
| Pixel fill rate | 39.60 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 79.20 GTexel/s | 59.2 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt | 47 Watt |
| Floating-point performance | 1,894 gflops | |
| Transistor count | 3,300 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Width | IGP | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 68.26 GB/s | 80.19 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2133 MHz (4.3 Gbps effective) | 6008 MHz |
| Memory type | LPDDR4X | GDDR5 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX with others
IntelIris Xe Graphics MAX vs
NVIDIAGeForce 205 OEM
IntelIris Xe Graphics MAX vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 730A
IntelIris Xe Graphics MAX vs
NVIDIAQuadro M4000
IntelIris Xe Graphics MAX vs
NVIDIAQuadro P1000
IntelIris Xe Graphics MAX vs
AMDRadeon RX 560
IntelIris Xe Graphics MAX vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
