Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX vs NVIDIA Quadro P620
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX and NVIDIA Quadro P620 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- Around 22% higher boost clock speed: 1650 MHz vs 1354 MHz
- 1701x more texture fill rate: 79.20 GTexel/s vs 46.56 GTexel / s
- Around 50% higher pipelines: 768 vs 512
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 10 nm vs 14 nm
- Around 60% lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 40 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 14% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 14238 vs 12475
- Around 93% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6889 vs 3575
- Around 93% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6889 vs 3575
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 31 Oct 2020 vs 1 February 2018 |
Boost clock speed | 1650 MHz vs 1354 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 79.20 GTexel/s vs 46.56 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 768 vs 512 |
Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm vs 14 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt vs 40 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 14238 vs 12475 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6889 vs 3575 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6889 vs 3575 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P620
- 4.2x more core clock speed: 1266 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 2.3x more memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 2133 MHz (4.3 Gbps effective)
- Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3881 vs 3462
- Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3881 vs 3462
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6631 vs 3214
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6631 vs 3214
- Around 77% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 549 vs 311
- Around 86% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3670 vs 1972
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1266 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz vs 2133 MHz (4.3 Gbps effective) |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3881 vs 3462 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3881 vs 3462 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6631 vs 3214 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6631 vs 3214 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 549 vs 311 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3670 vs 1972 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P620
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX | NVIDIA Quadro P620 |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 14238 | 12475 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6889 | 3575 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6889 | 3575 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3462 | 3881 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3462 | 3881 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3214 | 6631 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3214 | 6631 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 311 | 549 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1972 | 3670 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 43.877 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 773.248 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.082 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 53.425 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 184.343 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX | NVIDIA Quadro P620 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 12.1 | Pascal |
Code name | DG1 | GP107 |
Launch date | 31 Oct 2020 | 1 February 2018 |
Place in performance rating | 523 | 583 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Price now | $176.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 25.53 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1650 MHz | 1354 MHz |
Compute units | 96 | |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 1266 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm | 14 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 633.6 GFLOPS (1:4) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 5.069 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 2.534 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 768 | 512 |
Pixel fill rate | 39.60 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 79.20 GTexel/s | 46.56 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt | 40 Watt |
Floating-point performance | 1,490 gflops | |
Transistor count | 3,300 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 4x mini-DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Width | IGP | |
Length | 145 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 2.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 68.26 GB/s | 64.19 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2133 MHz (4.3 Gbps effective) | 5012 MHz |
Memory type | LPDDR4X | GDDR5 |