Intel UHD Graphics 610 vs AMD Radeon HD 6620G
Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 610 and AMD Radeon HD 6620G videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 610
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 32 nm
- 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 717 vs 341
- Around 72% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 177 vs 103
- 3.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2693 vs 879
- Around 36% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1071 vs 790
- Around 36% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1071 vs 790
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 3 April 2018 vs 15 June 2011 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 32 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 717 vs 341 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 177 vs 103 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2693 vs 879 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1071 vs 790 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1071 vs 790 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6620G
- Around 33% higher core clock speed: 400 MHz vs 300 MHz
- Around 41% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1755 vs 1241
- Around 41% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1755 vs 1241
- Around 95% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3310 vs 1699
- Around 95% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3310 vs 1699
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 400 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1755 vs 1241 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1755 vs 1241 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3310 vs 1699 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3310 vs 1699 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 610
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6620G
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | Intel UHD Graphics 610 | AMD Radeon HD 6620G |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 717 | 341 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 177 | 103 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2693 | 879 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1071 | 790 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1071 | 790 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1241 | 1755 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1241 | 1755 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1699 | 3310 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1699 | 3310 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel UHD Graphics 610 | AMD Radeon HD 6620G | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Terascale 2 |
Code name | Coffee Lake GT1 | Llano |
Launch date | 3 April 2018 | 15 June 2011 |
Place in performance rating | 1337 | 1346 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1050 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 400 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 32 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | |
Transistor count | 189 million | 1000 Million |
Pipelines | 400 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 11 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
Memory |
||
Shared memory | 1 |