Intel UHD Graphics 610 vs AMD Radeon HD 8550 OEM
Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 610 and AMD Radeon HD 8550 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 610
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
- 4x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 60 Watt
Launch date | 3 April 2018 vs 25 October 2013 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 60 Watt |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8550 OEM
- 2.2x more core clock speed: 650 MHz vs 300 MHz
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1088 vs 1071
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1088 vs 1071
- Around 22% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1519 vs 1241
- Around 22% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1519 vs 1241
- Around 34% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2278 vs 1699
- Around 34% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2278 vs 1699
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 650 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1088 vs 1071 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1088 vs 1071 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1519 vs 1241 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1519 vs 1241 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2278 vs 1699 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2278 vs 1699 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 610
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 8550 OEM
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | Intel UHD Graphics 610 | AMD Radeon HD 8550 OEM |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 712 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 175 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2685 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1071 | 1088 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1071 | 1088 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1241 | 1519 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1241 | 1519 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1699 | 2278 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1699 | 2278 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel UHD Graphics 610 | AMD Radeon HD 8550 OEM | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.5 | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | Coffee Lake GT1 | Turks |
Launch date | 3 April 2018 | 25 October 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 1342 | 1343 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1050 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 650 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 60 Watt |
Transistor count | 189 million | 716 million |
Floating-point performance | 624.0 gflops | |
Pipelines | 480 | |
Texture fill rate | 15.6 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 11.2 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR3 |