Intel UHD Graphics 610 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GT
Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 610 and NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 610
- Videocard is newer: launch date 9 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 65 nm
- 4.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 65 Watt
- Around 87% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 712 vs 381
- 2.2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 175 vs 81
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 3 April 2018 vs 29 July 2008 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 65 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 65 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 712 vs 381 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 175 vs 81 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GT
- Around 67% higher core clock speed: 500 MHz vs 300 MHz
- Around 91% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3237 vs 1699
- Around 91% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3237 vs 1699
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 500 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3237 vs 1699 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3237 vs 1699 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 610
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GT
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | Intel UHD Graphics 610 | NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GT |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 712 | 381 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 175 | 81 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2687 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1071 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1071 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1241 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1241 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1699 | 3237 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1699 | 3237 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel UHD Graphics 610 | NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GT | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Tesla |
Code name | Coffee Lake GT1 | G92 |
Launch date | 3 April 2018 | 29 July 2008 |
Place in performance rating | 1342 | 1340 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1050 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 500 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 65 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 65 Watt |
Transistor count | 189 million | 754 million |
CUDA cores | 96 | |
Floating-point performance | 240 gflops | |
Gigaflops | 360 | |
Pipelines | 96 | |
Texture fill rate | 24 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Laptop size | large | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | |
Memory bandwidth | 51.2 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR3 | |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
PureVideo HD |