Intel UHD Graphics 620 vs ATI Radeon IGP 340M

Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 620 and ATI Radeon IGP 340M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 620

• Videocard is newer: launch date 14 year(s) 10 month(s) later
• Around 64% higher core clock speed: 300 MHz vs 183 MHz
• 6.4x more boost clock speed: 1150 MHz vs 180 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 180 nm
• 347.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1043 vs 3
• 2.4x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 246 vs 102

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 620
GPU 2: ATI Radeon IGP 340M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1043 3
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	246 102

Compare specifications (specs)