Intel UHD Graphics 620 vs NVIDIA GeForce 910M

Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 620 and NVIDIA GeForce 910M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 620

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 0 month(s) later
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• 2.2x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 33 Watt
• Around 74% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1043 vs 601
• Around 92% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 246 vs 128
• Around 74% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4566 vs 2629
• 4.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 27.062 vs 6.448
• Around 75% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 273.504 vs 155.993
• 3.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.777 vs 0.574
• Around 63% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 19.939 vs 12.2
• Around 15% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 31.881 vs 27.733
• Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1397 vs 1344
• Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1397 vs 1344

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 910M

• 2.6x more core clock speed: 775 MHz vs 300 MHz
• 16x more pipelines: 384 vs 24
• 2.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2590 vs 878
• Around 36% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3020 vs 2227
• 2.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2590 vs 878
• Around 36% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3020 vs 2227

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 620
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 910M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1043 601
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	246 128
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	4566 2629
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	27.062 6.448
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	273.504 155.993
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.777 0.574
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	19.939 12.2
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	31.881 27.733
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1397 1344
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	878 2590
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2227 3020
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1397 1344
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	878 2590
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2227 3020

Compare specifications (specs)