Intel UHD Graphics 620 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT
Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 620 and NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 620
- Videocard is newer: launch date 9 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 65 nm
- 7x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 105 Watt
- 64x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 512 MB
- 2.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1045 vs 479
- 4.4x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 244 vs 56
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 September 2017 vs 29 October 2007 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 65 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 105 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 32 GB vs 512 MB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1045 vs 479 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 244 vs 56 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT
- 5x more core clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 4.7x more pipelines: 112 vs 24
- Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3346 vs 2227
- Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3346 vs 2227
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1500 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Pipelines | 112 vs 24 |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 vs 2227 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 vs 2227 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 620
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | Intel UHD Graphics 620 | NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1045 | 479 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 244 | 56 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4580 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 27.062 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 273.504 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.777 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 19.939 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 31.881 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1397 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 878 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2227 | 3346 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1397 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 878 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2227 | 3346 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 365 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel UHD Graphics 620 | NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Tesla |
Code name | Kaby Lake GT2 | G92 |
Launch date | 1 September 2017 | 29 October 2007 |
Place in performance rating | 1383 | 1380 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $349 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1150 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 1500 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 65 nm |
Pipelines | 24 | 112 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 105 Watt |
Transistor count | 189 million | 754 million |
CUDA cores | 112 | |
Floating-point performance | 336.0 gflops | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | |
Texture fill rate | 33.6 billion / sec | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video, Dual Link DVIHDTV |
Audio input for HDMI | S / PDIF | |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
Length | 9" (22.9 cm) | |
SLI options | 2-way | |
Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 8-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 2.1 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 32 GB | 512 MB |
Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory type | LPDDR3 / DDR4 | GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 1 | |
Memory bandwidth | 57.6 GB / s | |
Memory clock speed | 900 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync | ||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA | ||
High Dynamic-Range Lighting (HDRR) | 128bit |