Intel UHD Graphics P750 vs AMD Radeon R9 M395X

Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics P750 and AMD Radeon R9 M395X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, API support, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics P750

• Videocard is newer: launch date 9 year(s) 6 month(s) later
• 622.4x more texture fill rate: 57.60 GTexel/s vs 92.54 GTexel / s
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• 16.7x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 250 Watt

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M395X

• 2.4x more core clock speed: 723 MHz vs 300 MHz
• 8x more pipelines: 2048 vs 256
• Around 66% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 733 vs 441
• 3.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5195 vs 1671
• 4.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 27719 vs 6619

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics P750
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 M395X

PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	441 733
PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1671 5195
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	6619 27719

Compare specifications (specs)