Intel UHD Graphics P750 vs AMD Radeon R7 A265
Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics P750 and AMD Radeon R7 A265 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, API support, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics P750
- Videocard is newer: launch date 11 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 9% higher boost clock speed: 900 MHz vs 825 MHz
- 2909.1x more texture fill rate: 57.60 GTexel/s vs 19.8 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 67% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1662 vs 994
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 2021 vs 9 January 2014 |
Boost clock speed | 900 MHz vs 825 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 57.60 GTexel/s vs 19.8 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1662 vs 994 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 A265
- 2.4x more core clock speed: 725 MHz vs 300 MHz
- Around 50% higher pipelines: 384 vs 256
- Around 5% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 468 vs 445
- Around 5% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 6925 vs 6619
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 725 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Pipelines | 384 vs 256 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 468 vs 445 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6925 vs 6619 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics P750
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 A265
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | Intel UHD Graphics P750 | AMD Radeon R7 A265 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 445 | 468 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1662 | 994 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6619 | 6925 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel UHD Graphics P750 | AMD Radeon R7 A265 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 12.1 | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Rocket Lake GT1 | Opal |
Launch date | 2021 | 9 January 2014 |
Place in performance rating | 466 | 467 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 900 MHz | 825 MHz |
Compute units | 32 | |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 725 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 115.2 GFLOPS (1:4) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 921.6 GFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 460.8 GFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 256 | 384 |
Pixel fill rate | 28.80 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 57.60 GTexel/s | 19.8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | |
Floating-point performance | 633.6 gflops | |
Transistor count | 1,040 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | |
Memory type | DDR3 |