Intel UHD Graphics (Tiger Lake 16 EU) vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics (Tiger Lake 16 EU) and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics (Tiger Lake 16 EU)
- Videocard is newer: launch date 11 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- Around 34% higher boost clock speed: 1450 MHz vs 1085 MHz
- 267.3x more texture fill rate: 11.60 GTexel/s vs 43.4 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 10 nm vs 28 nm
- 4x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 60 Watt
| Launch date | 2021 vs 18 February 2014 |
| Boost clock speed | 1450 MHz vs 1085 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 11.60 GTexel/s vs 43.4 GTexel / s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 60 Watt |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
- 2.9x more core clock speed: 1020 MHz vs 350 MHz
- 5x more pipelines: 640 vs 128
| Core clock speed | 1020 MHz vs 350 MHz |
| Pipelines | 640 vs 128 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics (Tiger Lake 16 EU)
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
| Name | Intel UHD Graphics (Tiger Lake 16 EU) | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3901 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 521 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 11526 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 42.463 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 642.715 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.933 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 26.532 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 133.458 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4843 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3683 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3329 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4843 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3683 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3329 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 117 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel UHD Graphics (Tiger Lake 16 EU) | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Generation 12.1 | Maxwell |
| Code name | Tiger Lake GT1 | GM107 |
| Launch date | 2021 | 18 February 2014 |
| Place in performance rating | not rated | 707 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $149 | |
| Price now | $299.01 | |
| Type | Desktop | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 15.02 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1450 MHz | 1085 MHz |
| Compute units | 16 | |
| Core clock speed | 350 MHz | 1020 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 172.8 GFLOPS (1:4) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 1382 GFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 691.2 GFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 128 | 640 |
| Pixel fill rate | 5.800 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 11.60 GTexel/s | 43.4 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 60 Watt |
| CUDA cores | 640 | |
| Floating-point performance | 1,389 gflops | |
| Transistor count | 1,870 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One mini... |
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| G-SYNC support | ||
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Form factor | IGP | |
| Interface | Ring Bus | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Length | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
| Shader Model | 6.6 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | System Shared | 2 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | System Dependent | 86.4 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | System Shared | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | System Shared | 5.4 GB/s |
| Memory type | System Shared | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision Live | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| Blu Ray 3D | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare Intel UHD Graphics (Tiger Lake 16 EU) with others
IntelUHD Graphics (Tiger Lake 16 EU) vs
NVIDIARTX 6000 Ada Generation
IntelUHD Graphics (Tiger Lake 16 EU) vs
AMDRadeon Pro W6600X
IntelUHD Graphics (Tiger Lake 16 EU) vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3060 8 GB
