Intel UHD Graphics (Tiger Lake 16 EU) vs NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation
Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics (Tiger Lake 16 EU) and NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics (Tiger Lake 16 EU)
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- 8.2x more texture fill rate: 11.60 GTexel/s vs 1,423 GTexel/s
- 20x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 300 Watt
Launch date | 2021 vs 3 Dec 2022 |
Texture fill rate | 11.60 GTexel/s vs 1,423 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 300 Watt |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation
- 2.6x more core clock speed: 915 MHz vs 350 MHz
- Around 73% higher boost clock speed: 2505 MHz vs 1450 MHz
- 142x more pipelines: 18176 vs 128
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 4 nm vs 10 nm
Core clock speed | 915 MHz vs 350 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 2505 MHz vs 1450 MHz |
Pipelines | 18176 vs 128 |
Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm vs 10 nm |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics (Tiger Lake 16 EU)
GPU 2: NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation
Name | Intel UHD Graphics (Tiger Lake 16 EU) | NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 972 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 28522 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 321436 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel UHD Graphics (Tiger Lake 16 EU) | NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 12.1 | Ada Lovelace |
Code name | Tiger Lake GT1 | AD102 |
Launch date | 2021 | 3 Dec 2022 |
Place in performance rating | not rated | 6 |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1450 MHz | 2505 MHz |
Compute units | 16 | |
Core clock speed | 350 MHz | 915 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm | 4 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 172.8 GFLOPS (1:4) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 1382 GFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 691.2 GFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 128 | 18176 |
Pixel fill rate | 5.800 GPixel/s | 481.0 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 11.60 GTexel/s | 1,423 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 300 Watt |
Transistor count | 76300 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | 4x DisplayPort 1.4a |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | IGP | Dual-slot |
Interface | Ring Bus | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm, 10.5 inches | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 700 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 16-pin | |
Width | 112 mm, 4.4 inches | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | 3.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.6 | 6.7 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | System Shared | 48 GB |
Memory bandwidth | System Dependent | 960.0 GB/s |
Memory bus width | System Shared | 384 bit |
Memory clock speed | System Shared | 2500 MHz, 20 Gbps effective |
Memory type | System Shared | GDDR6 |