Intel UHD Graphics vs AMD Radeon R7 M520
Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics and AMD Radeon R7 M520 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- Around 40% higher texture fill rate: 28.80 vs 20.6 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 3.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 50 Watt
Launch date | 21 Aug 2019 vs 18 April 2017 |
Texture fill rate | 28.80 vs 20.6 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 50 Watt |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 M520
- Around 67% higher pipelines: 320 vs 192
Pipelines | 320 vs 192 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 M520
Name | Intel UHD Graphics | AMD Radeon R7 M520 |
---|---|---|
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 23.007 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 315.843 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.342 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 19.68 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 28.708 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 282 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1490 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 17889 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel UHD Graphics | AMD Radeon R7 M520 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.5 | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Comet Lake GT2 | Oland |
Launch date | 21 Aug 2019 | 18 April 2017 |
Place in performance rating | 1179 | 1181 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz | |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 192 | 320 |
Texture fill rate | 28.80 | 20.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 50 Watt |
Core clock speed | 1030 MHz | |
Floating-point performance | 659.2 gflops | |
Transistor count | 1,040 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 16 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz | |
Memory type | DDR3 |