Matrox G450 vs ATI Rage 128 PRO Ultra
Comparative analysis of Matrox G450 and ATI Rage 128 PRO Ultra videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Matrox G450
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 180 nm vs 250 nm
- 2.6x more memory clock speed: 332 MHz vs 130 MHz
Launch date | 1 January 2001 vs 1 August 1999 |
Manufacturing process technology | 180 nm vs 250 nm |
Memory clock speed | 332 MHz vs 130 MHz |
Reasons to consider the ATI Rage 128 PRO Ultra
- Around 4% higher core clock speed: 130 MHz vs 125 MHz
- Around 4% higher texture fill rate: 260.0 MTexel / s vs 250.0 MTexel / s
Core clock speed | 130 MHz vs 125 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 260.0 MTexel / s vs 250.0 MTexel / s |
Compare specifications (specs)
Matrox G450 | ATI Rage 128 PRO Ultra | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | G400 | Rage 4 |
Code name | Condor | Rage 4 |
Launch date | 1 January 2001 | 1 August 1999 |
Place in performance rating | not rated | not rated |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 125 MHz | 130 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 180 nm | 250 nm |
Texture fill rate | 250.0 MTexel / s | 260.0 MTexel / s |
Transistor count | 10 million | 8 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x VGA | 1x VGA |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCI | AGP 4x |
Length | 150 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 6.0 | 6.0 |
OpenGL | None | 1.2 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 32 MB | 32 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 2.656 GB / s | 1.04 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 332 MHz | 130 MHz |
Memory type | DDR | SDR |