Matrox G450 vs ATI Rage 128 PRO Ultra

Comparative analysis of Matrox G450 and ATI Rage 128 PRO Ultra videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Matrox G450

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 5 month(s) later
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 180 nm vs 250 nm
  • 2.6x more memory clock speed: 332 MHz vs 130 MHz
Launch date 1 January 2001 vs 1 August 1999
Manufacturing process technology 180 nm vs 250 nm
Memory clock speed 332 MHz vs 130 MHz

Reasons to consider the ATI Rage 128 PRO Ultra

  • Around 4% higher core clock speed: 130 MHz vs 125 MHz
  • Around 4% higher texture fill rate: 260.0 MTexel / s vs 250.0 MTexel / s
Core clock speed 130 MHz vs 125 MHz
Texture fill rate 260.0 MTexel / s vs 250.0 MTexel / s

Compare specifications (specs)

Matrox G450 ATI Rage 128 PRO Ultra

Essentials

Architecture G400 Rage 4
Code name Condor Rage 4
Launch date 1 January 2001 1 August 1999
Place in performance rating not rated not rated
Type Desktop Desktop

Technical info

Core clock speed 125 MHz 130 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 180 nm 250 nm
Texture fill rate 250.0 MTexel / s 260.0 MTexel / s
Transistor count 10 million 8 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors 1x DVI, 1x VGA 1x VGA

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCI AGP 4x
Length 150 mm
Supplementary power connectors None

API support

DirectX 6.0 6.0
OpenGL None 1.2

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 32 MB 32 MB
Memory bandwidth 2.656 GB / s 1.04 GB / s
Memory bus width 64 Bit 64 Bit
Memory clock speed 332 MHz 130 MHz
Memory type DDR SDR