NVIDIA A100 SXM4 40 GB vs NVIDIA Tesla T4
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA A100 SXM4 40 GB and NVIDIA Tesla T4 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA A100 SXM4 40 GB
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- Around 9% higher core clock speed: 1095 MHz vs 1005 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 12 nm
- 3.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 200534 vs 61276
- Around 49% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 21006 vs 14076
- Around 49% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 21006 vs 14076
- 14.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 27823 vs 1976
- 14.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 27823 vs 1976
- 29.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 51880 vs 1781
- 29.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 51880 vs 1781
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 14 May 2020 vs 13 September 2018 |
| Core clock speed | 1095 MHz vs 1005 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 12 nm |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 200534 vs 61276 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 21006 vs 14076 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 21006 vs 14076 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 27823 vs 1976 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 27823 vs 1976 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 51880 vs 1781 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 51880 vs 1781 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla T4
- Around 7% higher boost clock speed: 1515 MHz vs 1410 MHz
- 5.3x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 400 Watt
- 8.2x more memory clock speed: 10000 MHz vs 1215 MHz (2.4 Gbps effective)
| Boost clock speed | 1515 MHz vs 1410 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 400 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 10000 MHz vs 1215 MHz (2.4 Gbps effective) |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA A100 SXM4 40 GB
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla T4
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA A100 SXM4 40 GB | NVIDIA Tesla T4 |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 200534 | 61276 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 21006 | 14076 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 21006 | 14076 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 27823 | 1976 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 27823 | 1976 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 51880 | 1781 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 51880 | 1781 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 10744 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 590 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 127.622 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3026.812 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 18.798 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 119.936 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 910.721 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA A100 SXM4 40 GB | NVIDIA Tesla T4 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Ampere | Turing |
| Code name | GA100 | TU104 |
| Launch date | 14 May 2020 | 13 September 2018 |
| Place in performance rating | 10 | 278 |
| Type | Workstation | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1410 MHz | 1515 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1095 MHz | 1005 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 9.746 TFLOPS (1:2) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 77.97 TFLOPS (4:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 19.49 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 6912 | |
| Pixel fill rate | 225.6 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 609.1 GTexel/s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 400 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Transistor count | 54200 million | 13,600 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Form factor | IGP | |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 800 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
| OpenCL | 3.0 | |
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
Memory |
||
| High bandwidth memory (HBM) | ||
| Maximum RAM amount | 40 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 1555 GB/s | |
| Memory bus width | 5120 bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 1215 MHz (2.4 Gbps effective) | 10000 MHz |
| Memory type | HBM2e | |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA A100 SXM4 40 GB with others
NVIDIAA100 SXM4 40 GB vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4070 Ti
NVIDIAA100 SXM4 40 GB vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4080
NVIDIAA100 SXM4 40 GB vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4090
NVIDIAA100 SXM4 40 GB vs
AMDRadeon RX 7900 XTX
NVIDIAA100 SXM4 40 GB vs
AMDRadeon PRO W7900
NVIDIAA100 SXM4 40 GB vs
NVIDIARTX 4500 Ada Generation
