NVIDIA A800 SXM4 80 GB vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 D
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA A800 SXM4 80 GB and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 D videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA A800 SXM4 80 GB
- 530.1x more texture fill rate: 609.1 GTexel/s vs 1,149 GTexel/s
- Around 6% lower typical power consumption: 400 Watt vs 425 Watt
- 3.3x more maximum memory size: 80 GB vs 24 GB
- Around 21% higher memory clock speed: 1593 MHz, 3.2 Gbps effective vs 1313 MHz, 21 Gbps effective
Texture fill rate | 609.1 GTexel/s vs 1,149 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 400 Watt vs 425 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 80 GB vs 24 GB |
Memory clock speed | 1593 MHz, 3.2 Gbps effective vs 1313 MHz, 21 Gbps effective |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 D
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- Around 97% higher core clock speed: 2280 MHz vs 1155 MHz
- Around 79% higher boost clock speed: 2520 MHz vs 1410 MHz
- 2.1x more pipelines: 14592 vs 6912
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 5 nm vs 7 nm
Launch date | 28 Dec 2023 vs 11 Aug 2022 |
Core clock speed | 2280 MHz vs 1155 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 2520 MHz vs 1410 MHz |
Pipelines | 14592 vs 6912 |
Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm vs 7 nm |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA A800 SXM4 80 GB
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 D
Name | NVIDIA A800 SXM4 80 GB | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 D |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 980 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 36196 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 275400 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 34361 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA A800 SXM4 80 GB | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 D | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Ada Lovelace |
Code name | GA100 | AD102 |
Launch date | 11 Aug 2022 | 28 Dec 2023 |
Place in performance rating | not rated | 3 |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1410 MHz | 2520 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1155 MHz | 2280 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 5 nm |
Pipelines | 6912 | 14592 |
Pixel fill rate | 225.6 GPixel/s | 443.5 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 609.1 GTexel/s | 1,149 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 400 Watt | 425 Watt |
Transistor count | 54200 million | 76300 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | SXM Module | Triple-slot |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 800 Watt | 800 Watt |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 16-pin |
Height | 61 mm, 2.4 inches | |
Length | 304 mm, 12 inches | |
Width | 137 mm, 5.4 inches | |
API support |
||
OpenCL | 3.0 | 3.0 |
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
Shader Model | 6.7 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 80 GB | 24 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 2.04 TB/s | 1.01 TB/s |
Memory bus width | 5120 bit | 384 bit |
Memory clock speed | 1593 MHz, 3.2 Gbps effective | 1313 MHz, 21 Gbps effective |
Memory type | HBM2e | GDDR6X |