NVIDIA CMP 50HX vs NVIDIA GRID K120Q
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA CMP 50HX and NVIDIA GRID K120Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA CMP 50HX
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Around 59% higher core clock speed: 1350 MHz vs 850 MHz
- 21808.8x more texture fill rate: 296.6 GTexel/s vs 13.6 GTexel / s
- 18.7x more pipelines: 3584 vs 192
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
- 20x more maximum memory size: 10 GB vs 512 MB
Launch date | 24 Jun 2021 vs 2 July 2014 |
Core clock speed | 1350 MHz vs 850 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 296.6 GTexel/s vs 13.6 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 3584 vs 192 |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 28 nm |
Maximum memory size | 10 GB vs 512 MB |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GRID K120Q
- Around 92% lower typical power consumption: 130 Watt vs 250 Watt
- Around 2% higher memory clock speed: 1782 MHz vs 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 130 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 1782 MHz vs 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA CMP 50HX
GPU 2: NVIDIA GRID K120Q
Name | NVIDIA CMP 50HX | NVIDIA GRID K120Q |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 38889 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 293 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 278 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA CMP 50HX | NVIDIA GRID K120Q | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | Kepler |
Code name | TU102 | GK107 |
Launch date | 24 Jun 2021 | 2 July 2014 |
Place in performance rating | 571 | 573 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $125 | |
Type | Workstation | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1545 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1350 MHz | 850 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 3584 | 192 |
Pixel fill rate | 123.6 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 296.6 GTexel/s | 13.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 130 Watt |
Transistor count | 18600 million | 1,270 million |
Floating-point performance | 326.4 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Dual-slot | |
Height | 35 mm, 1.4 inches | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm, 10.5 inches | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 600 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | |
Width | 116 mm, 4.6 inches | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 10 GB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 560.0 GB/s | 28.51 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 320 bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective | 1782 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | DDR3 |