NVIDIA CMP 50HX vs ATI Radeon E2400
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA CMP 50HX and ATI Radeon E2400 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA CMP 50HX
- Videocard is newer: launch date 13 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- 2.3x more core clock speed: 1350 MHz vs 600 MHz
- 123583.3x more texture fill rate: 296.6 GTexel/s vs 2.4 GTexel / s
- 89.6x more pipelines: 3584 vs 40
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 65 nm
- 80x more maximum memory size: 10 GB vs 128 MB
- Around 25% higher memory clock speed: 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective vs 1400 MHz
Launch date | 24 Jun 2021 vs 28 June 2007 |
Core clock speed | 1350 MHz vs 600 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 296.6 GTexel/s vs 2.4 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 3584 vs 40 |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 65 nm |
Maximum memory size | 10 GB vs 128 MB |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective vs 1400 MHz |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon E2400
- 10x lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 250 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA CMP 50HX
GPU 2: ATI Radeon E2400
Name | NVIDIA CMP 50HX | ATI Radeon E2400 |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 38889 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 287 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 52 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA CMP 50HX | ATI Radeon E2400 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | TeraScale |
Code name | TU102 | RV610 |
Launch date | 24 Jun 2021 | 28 June 2007 |
Place in performance rating | 570 | 568 |
Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1545 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1350 MHz | 600 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 65 nm |
Pipelines | 3584 | 40 |
Pixel fill rate | 123.6 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 296.6 GTexel/s | 2.4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 25 Watt |
Transistor count | 18600 million | 180 million |
Floating-point performance | 48 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Dual-slot | |
Height | 35 mm, 1.4 inches | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-II |
Length | 267 mm, 10.5 inches | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 600 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | |
Width | 116 mm, 4.6 inches | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 10.0 |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 10 GB | 128 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 560.0 GB/s | 11.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 320 bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective | 1400 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR3 |